|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to the Mitsubishi ASX Vs MG ZS comparison for 2020. With the updated 2020 ASX back in the running with a facelift, the competition has not been idle and the Chinese owned MG brand has released it’s value for money challenger SUV in the form of the MG ZS. We’ve compared them before but clearly worth an updated comparison as the value for money small SUV class has had a few changes over the years.
Mitsubishi ASX Vs MG ZS exterior comparison: The MG ZS is basically a copied older Mazda CX-5 design but they have modified it enough to prevent law suits for outright copying. It’s Ok to look at just looks too familiar but in an awkward way. In comparison the updated ASX is a very well executed facelift of a 10 year old design and looks for contemporary without resorting to copying other brands designs.
Mitsubishi ASX Vs MG ZS interior comparison: The MG ZS interior looks good on the surface, conservative with decent materials but it is only surface deep. There are a few inconsequential gadgets you get for the same price as the entry level ASX model just check out their features list. However the more substantial feeling and even nicer but largely pointless gadgets like interior lighting push the ASX ahead of the ZS.
Mitsubishi ASX Vs MG ZS engines and and technology comparison: The MG ZS is ultimately is pretty basic with the optional 3 cylinder turbo petrol engine that sets it apart. The ASX has basic engines with more power but has up to date safety systems to lift it above the MG. The four speed auto vs CVT in the ASX is a the it or leave it choice really. To be completely fair the top range MG ZS has a sunroof and fake leather trim as features missing from the same priced ASX. Note that we prefer a nice set f cloth or wool seats than leather or fake.
Mitsubishi ASX Vs MG ZS street cred: The Mitsubishi has built and enviably reputation in the class and a robust and affordable small SUV that is value for money. This is worked well over the last decade and that’s nothing wrong with having one the drive way or on the street. The MG ZS is still an unknown factor and due to our conclusion and explanation below, driving a MG ZS is not something to be vaguely proud of.
The winner of the Mitsubishi ASX Vs MG ZS is the ASX. It is the updated safety systems, proven reliability of the ASX that makes it a better choice. The unoriginal styling, unproven mechanical components, lack of safety and so forth count against the MG ZS. In reality makes the MG’s seeming cheap price becomes quite expensive in comparison to the ASX. That fact that the MG ZS is missing auto brakes and minimal class safety is a big problem. Added to that, even second hand SUV in the same price bracket have safety and durability substantially better than this new one is concerning.
At the time of this post the $25,000 drive away price for the mid range MG ZS “Excite’ model which seems great until you release that it’s missing a lot of safety systems, has an under powered engine although it has a turbo but even a Toyota Yaris has more power than the MG ZS. The top range ‘Essence’ model costs $28,000 which still misses the safety systems in the entry level ASX and the only difference is vinyl seats and a glass roof in the MG. It really shows that the low selling price of the MG ZS has it’s attractions to those who don’t care about anything else. For us this is a short sighted decision and really shows that the MG ZS is overpriced in this class hence not worth considering at all. In fact the MG ZS becomes the most expensive small SUV in the class! The MG ZS target market is not normal sensible purchasers but those with less than average brain power. In comparison it confirms that the Mitsubishi ASX is one of the best small SUV for sale in 2020.
| Mitsubishi ASX | MG ZS |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| 4 Cylinder petrol (91 Octane) 2.0 Litre (1998cc) DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 110Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 197Nm @ 4200RPM |
3 Cylinder Petrol (95 Octane) 1.0 Litre (999cc) Turbo DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 82Kw @ 6000 RPM Claimed 160Nm @ 1800 RPM |
| 4 Cylinder petrol (91 Octane) 2.4 Litre (2360cc) DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 123Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 222Nm @ 4100RPM |
4 Cylinder Petrol (91 Octane) 1.5 Litre (1499cc) DOHC VVT DI EFI Claimed 84Kw @ 6000 RPM Claimed 150Nm @ 4500 RPM |
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight 1390 Kg Towing capacity up to 1400kg |
Kerb weight FROM 1255Kg Towing capacity up to 500 kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 63 litres IL4 2.0 Petrol 6.7 litres per 100km IL4 2.4 Petrol 7.9 litres per 100km |
Up to 48 litres IL3 1.0 Turbo Petrol 6.7 litres per 100km IL4 1.5 litre Petrol 7.1 litres per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 5 speed manual or 6 speed CVT Auto Overall height/width 1640/1810 Overall length/Wheelbase 4365/2670 4WD system: FWD or AWD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 |
4 or 6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1644/1809 Overall length/wheelbase 4314/2585 4WD system: 2WD ANCAP Safety: 4/5 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) 219mm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) 220 mm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
| Performance | |
| Pricing | |
| 2020 $23,990 – 33,240 AUD 2018 $25,000 – 37,000 AUD 2017 $25,000 – 37,000 AUD 2015 $24,990 – 35,490 AUD 2013 $24,990 – 36,490 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |
2018 $20,990 – 23,990 AUD |