|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to the all new Toyota CH-R Vs Nissan Juke comparison for 2017. The CH-R has not really left a mark on us in any way except for styling and how expensive it is. The Nissan Juke in many ways is the template for the CH-R, since the Juke was released over 5 years ago it still remains one of the most bold designs in the small SUV class. Of course the Juke is more than just a pretty face for many it still sells very well. The popularity of the CH-R is yet to be determined
Toyota CH-R Vs Nissan Juke exterior comparison: Both are unique in their approach to style both very modern. You won’t mistake the Juke as anything else likewise the CH-R. Both manufacturers should be congratulated for bringing concept car styling into the real world. We like both designs. How we think more people will like the CH-R.
Toyota CH-R Vs Nissan Juke interior comparison: The interior of the Juke follows on from its exterior styling by being the most modern and stylish in the class with curves, colors, buttons and screens. It’s futuristic in design but lacks the quality of materials that are used in SUVs like the CX-3 made for 2017. Update the materials and it would fit right in to the latest models, that said it’s still a nice place to be in especially with the optional sports seats. The CH-R is nice place to be, a little dark but it’s mostly modern, even the tablet style stereo screen. This may be the latest styling trend but we think it is a short cut to properly integrated dashboards like the one on the Juke. Overall the CH-R has a nice, modern higher quality interior but ordinary where as the Juke has character.
Toyota CH-R Vs Nissan Juke engines and and technology comparison: The CH-R has more standard safety tech but that’s the only area it beats the Juke, admittedly the 360 viewing camera on the top range Juke is a feature the CH-R does not have. The Juke is arguably the most advanced small SUV on sale. It has a cut down version of the GTR AWD system in some models and a powerful turbo engine when optioned, what more can you ask for in 2017? Unique driver tech included a G force display, driver modes that actually change gears and steering feel. While safety systems in the Juke will eventually catchup the current levels are industry standard. Both have small turbo engines and CVT transmissions so nothing new except that the Toyota’s engine merely has adequate power. The CH-R is also hampered by a 200-300kg weigh gain from the Duke.
Toyota CH-R Vs Nissan Juke drive comparison: N/A
The winner of the Toyota CH-R Vs Nissan Juke comparison is the draw. The styling inside and outside approach to really quite different to say which one is better. It’s up to you to decide which one looks better in your driveway of parking spot. Technically the Juke has more tech but the CH-R has low speed auto braking which rates highly with us compared to the 360 view camera on the Juke. The Juke has a lower entry price by $3000AUD which is a decent holiday but the CH-R has a higher quality interior… Does the price difference make the Juke a better car? yes and no because while it has all the standard safety systems it’s missing auto braking hence neither car is a winner.
| Nissan Juke | Toyota CH-R |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| 4 Cylinder Turbo Petrol (2015) 1.2 Litre (1197cc) 95 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 85Kw @ 4500RPM Claimed 190Nm @ 2000RPM |
IL4 Cylinder Petrol (8NR-FTS) DI DOHC EFI VVT Turbo 1.2 Litre (1197cc) Claimed 86Kw @ 5200RPM Claimed 185Nm @ 1500PM |
| 4 Cylinder Turbo Petrol 1.6 Litre (1618cc) 95 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 140Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 240Nm @ 2000RPM |
|
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight FROM 1160Kg Towing capacity up to 1200kg |
Kerb weight FROM 1440Kg Towing capacity up to 800Kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 46 – 50 litres (95 Octane) IL4 1.6 Turbo 7.4 litres per 100km (petrol) IL4 1.6 6.3 litres per 100km (petrol) |
50 litres 95 Octane 1.2 litre Petrol 6.5 litres per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 6 speed manual or CVT Auto Overall height/width 1565/1765 Overall length/wheelbase 4135/2530 4WD system: FWD or AWD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 Tyre size: 215-55-15 |
CVT or 6 Speed Manual Overall height/width 1565/1795 Overall length/wheelbase 4360/2640 Drive system: On demand AWD or 2WD Tyre size: 225-50-17 inch – 18 inch NCAP safety rating 5/5 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) 180 mm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) xxxmm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
| Performance | |
| 1.2 Petrol 0-100kph 10 secs 1.6 Petrol 0-100kph 10 secs 1.6 Petrol Turbo 0-100kph 8 secs |
|
| Pricing | |
| 2016 FROM $23,490 – 33,490 AUD 2015 FROM $22,990 – 32,490 AUD 2013 FROM $21,990 – 32,190 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |
2017 $26,990 – 35,590 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |