{"id":10705,"date":"2021-01-29T23:31:59","date_gmt":"2021-01-29T12:31:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/?p=10705"},"modified":"2021-03-16T21:26:50","modified_gmt":"2021-03-16T10:26:50","slug":"ford-puma-vs-mazda-cx-3-comparison","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/ford-puma-vs-mazda-cx-3-comparison\/","title":{"rendered":"Ford Puma Vs Mazda CX-3 Comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n
\n

\"Mazda
Mazda CX-3<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n
VS<\/td>\n\n

\"Ford
Ford Puma<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Welcome to the Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-3 comparison. The CX-3 hasn’t been updated since it’s release in 2014 and it’s design at that time was ahead of the competition and we liked it and other reasons. With the release of the new Ford Puma we are comparing the two to see if the Mazda CX-3 is still worth buying or should the Puma be on top of your shopping list.<\/p>\n

Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-3 exterior: The Puma uses Ford’s latest design language it genuinely looks good after a little while. To us the Puma looks like a small Jaguar or even a Porsche so has a sporting style to it. The CX-3 design in comparison still looks up to date – we don’t think is aged. The CX-3 looks better on the outside but we don’t think there’s much difference on the inside. We like both designs but tend to look at the more intriguing Ford Puma.<\/p>\n

Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-3 interior: The CX-3 interior is a nice place to be making hard plastic actually look good. The availability of colour options also help personalise and improve the interior ambience. Since the interior is shared with the MX-5 adds some sportiness to it’s look. The Ford Puma has a decent interior as well and the large digital panel is quite flashy if optioned. It does catch your attention so eyes tend to ignore the quite ordinary design elsewhere. Since they are both nice for the price and different it’s a personal choice.<\/p>\n

Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-3 engine and technology: For us the mechanical package of the CX-3 is the selling point. It comes with good standard safety systems and high efficient conventional engine specs. The Mazda’s 2 litre engine is arguably the most efficient non-turbo engine on sale at the moment with high torque at relatively low diesel engine like revs is a good drive when commuting. The AWD option also scores additional points. The Ford Puma has a 1.0 litre turbo that almost matches the CX-3 in terms of outright power although neither cars are particularly fast. Safety systems are dependent on model grade and specials.<\/p>\n

The winner of the Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-3 comparison is the CX-3. The CX-3 may be 4 years older than the Puma but it has stood the test of time. Why would you buy a Ford Puma over the CX-3? your decision will probably be based on brand, looks and price and how it drives rather than a detailed spec or showroom comparison like this.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mazda CX-3<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nFord Puma
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\"\"<\/td>\n\"\"<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Engines<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
IL4 Cylinder Petrol
\nDOHC EFI
\n2.0 Litre (1998cc)
\nClaimed 109Kw @ 6000RPM
\nClaimed 192Nm @ 2800PM<\/td>\n		3 Cylinder\u00a0petrol (95 Octane)
\n1.0 Litre (999cc)
\nTurbo DOHC VVT DI EFI
\nClaimed 92Kw @ 6000RPM
\nClaimed 170Nm @ 1500RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
IL4 cylinder Diesel
\n1.5 Litre (1499cc)
\nTurbo-charged – DI – CR
\nClaimed 77kW @ 4000rpm
\nClaimed 270Nm @ 1600rpm<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Weight<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
From Approx Kerb weight 1200 Kg
\nTowing capacity up to 1200kg<\/td>\n		Kerb weight 1291 Kg
\nTowing capacity up to 750kg<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fuel capacity & consumption<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44 litres
\n2.0 litre Petrol: 6.7 litres per 100km
\n1.5 Litre Diesel: 5.1 litres per 100km<\/td>\n		Up to 42 litres
\nIL3 1.0 Petrol 5.3 litres per 100km<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Other specifications<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6 speed Auto or 6 speed manual
\nOverall height\/width 1550\/1765
\nOverall length\/wheelbase 4275\/2570
\nDrive system: On demand AWD or 2WD
\nTyre size: 215-50-18 215-60-16
\nNCAP safety rating 5\/5<\/td>\n		7 speed DCT Auto
\nOverall height\/width 1548\/1805
\nOverall length\/Wheelbase 4207\/2588
\n4WD system: 2WD or AWD
\nANCAP Safety: 5\/5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capability <\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Angle of: (degrees)
\nApproach xx Departure xx Breakover xx
\nGround clearance (unloaded) 180 mm
\nWater Fording depth xxmm Max<\/td>\n		Angle of: (degrees)
\nApproach xx Departure xx Breakover xx
\nGround clearance (unloaded) xxmm
\nWater Fording depth xxmm Max<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Performance<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
–<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pricing<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2020 $24,650 – 38,450 AUD
\n2019 $21,790 – 37,290 AUD
\n2017 $20,500 – 37,490 AUD<\/td>\n		2021 $29,990 – 35,540 AUD<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
*Specs change due to model grade and configuration. Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change!<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

VS Welcome to the Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-3 comparison. The CX-3 hasn’t been updated since it’s release in 2014 and it’s design at that time was ahead of the competition and we liked it and other reasons. With the release of the new Ford Puma we are comparing the two to see if the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[243,48,51,618,6],"tags":[669,620,666,245],"class_list":["post-10705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cx-3","category-ford","category-mazda","category-puma","category-small-suv-reviews","tag-best-smal-suv","tag-ford-puma","tag-ford-puma-vs-mazda-cx-3-comparison","tag-mazda-cx-3"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10705"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10705\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10871,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10705\/revisions\/10871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10705"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}