{"id":12309,"date":"2023-04-21T22:31:42","date_gmt":"2023-04-21T12:31:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/?p=12309"},"modified":"2023-05-03T22:52:25","modified_gmt":"2023-05-03T12:52:25","slug":"2023-ford-ranger-vs-2024-ford-ranger-comparison","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/2023-ford-ranger-vs-2024-ford-ranger-comparison\/","title":{"rendered":"2023 Ford Ranger Vs 2024 Ford Ranger Comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n
\n

\"Ford
Ford Ranger (2024)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n
VS<\/td>\n\n

\"Ford
Ford Ranger (2023)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Welcome to the old Ford Ranger (2023) vs new Ford Ranger (2024) comparison for 2023. Predictably as still hot from the factory in Thailand the new Ford Ranger is here and mostly out of stock! Things have change since the last set of ute and light Truck comparisons since 2019. For example the Mercedes X Class is no more, the D-Max is now also a Mazda but mostly the VW Amarok is now also Ford Ranger. There are also plenty of new models in the form of Chinese brands. Now, most would consider it pointless to compare the old Ford Ranger to the new Ranger but we don’t think so for reasons below.<\/p>\n

Ford Ranger (2023) vs new Ford Ranger (2024) exterior comparison: The old Ranger was a nice looking ute or small truck. The best part about it was the front end which was recognisably Ford and truck like. Unlike the Triton revamp for example \u00a0the rest of the Ranger body is still very Japanese, specifically Mazda but nonetheless looked big and bulky. Regardless and overall the old Ranger looked well proportioned.\u00a0In comparison the new Ford Ranger is yet another mod of the old model and we think in a bit of a crisis in terms of design. Gone are the last generation Japanese inspired styling except for the same door skins and in with the latest rear profile as per the SEA or Japanese designs and to a more Toyota Tacoma design rather than an evolution of the last model. Sure the Ranger front end is more looking more like the F series truck and not forgetting the Ford Maverick in North America but the rest is not. We don’t even think the VW Amarok twin will even resemble the origin Amarok in terms of looks. In the end the new Ford Ranger is still look decent but there’s too much Tacoma in the design language on the outside.<\/p>\n

Ford Ranger (2023) vs new Ford Ranger (2024) interior comparison: The old Ranger interior was a nice place to be in, due mainly to car like levels of materials and size. However it was on the Spartan side to look at. \u00a0In comparison the new Ford Ranger uses styling that more people understand. It’s a bit like the original Teslas and indeed the latest Volvos and the latest F-Series trucks as well. So the new Ranger’s interior is best described conservative with big digital screens to distract you. Low grade Rangers are very cheap to be in and clearly equipped with commercial grade parts including vinyl flooring as it is only the high end Ford Rangers that are well appointed which you’s expect for the price. \u00a0Not quite luxury not quite premium but what you’d expect for the price which is even higher.<\/p>\n

Ford Ranger (2023) vs new Ford Ranger (2024) engine and technology comparison: Since the new model is shared with VW Amarok the only seeming carry over is the 2 litre turbo diesel the rest of the engine options drive train appear to be from Land Rover or VW which is good and bad. Needles to say parts will probably be expensive and you will need to replace them more often. The biggest change is the AWD system rather than part time 4WD system and even without it optioned weight has gone up in heft by around 200kg.<\/p>\n

Ford Ranger (2023) vs new Ford Ranger (2024) cred comparison: The Ranger has street cred and a loyal fan base so there is something in Ford=truck maker cred. However we think that only applies to the Ranger Raptor model which a genuine performance truck. It has enough cred and differences at least for now for us to compare it as a separate model.<\/p>\n

The winner of the Ford Ranger (2023) vs new Ford Ranger (2024) comparison is the new Ranger. While only the Raptor model truly wins by being different to the normal Ranger. However the rest of the model grades have enough gadgets to win over new buyers. The only issue we have is that it is not any more efficient than the older model which new cars are supposed to be. It’s slower and uses more fuel in real life and makes a mockery of the claimed fuel efficiency and real life. Base models are model expensive than mid range utes from other manufacturers as you will see there is probably \u00a0not enough features to justify the noticeably higher price. That said prices for any new car has gone up tremendously and it is fortunate that Ford hasn’t raised prices completely beyond what the market will tolerate and shortages for all manufacturers except for Chinese brands (for some reason) but we will analyse that later.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Ford Ranger (2023)
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n		Ford Ranger (2024)
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\"2015_ranger_2\"<\/td>\n\"\"<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Engines<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
IL5 Cylinder Diesel
\n3.2 Litre (3198cc) Diesel
\nSingle Turbo DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 147Kw @ 3000 RPM
\nClaimed 470Nm @ 1750 RPM<\/td>\n		IL4 Cylinder Diesel
\n2 Litre (1996cc)
\nSingle Turbo IC DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 125Kw @ 3500 RPM
\nClaimed 405Nm @ 1750 RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
IL4 Cylinder Diesel
\nTwin Turbo DI CR
\n2.0 Litre (1996cc) Diesel
\nClaimed 157Kw @ 3750 RPM
\nClaimed 500Nm @ 1750 RPM<\/td>\n		IL4 Cylinder Diesel
\n2 Litre (1996cc)
\nTwin Turbo IC DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 154Kw @ 3750 RPM
\nClaimed 500Nm @ 1750 RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.2 Litre (2198cc) Diesel
\nTurbo DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 118Kw @ 3200 RPM
\nClaimed 385Nm @ 1600 RPM<\/td>\n		V6 Cylinder Diesel
\n3.0 Litre (2993cc) Diesel
\nTurbo DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 184Kw @ 3250 RPM
\nClaimed 600Nm @ 1750 RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRanger Raptor (Mod)
\nV6 Cylinder Petrol
\n3.0 Litre (2993cc)
\nTurbo DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 292Kw @ 5650 RPM
\nClaimed 583Nm @ 3500 RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Weight<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FROM Approx 2000Kg
\nTowing capacity up to 3500kg<\/td>\n		FROM 2200 Kg (4×4)
\nTowing capacity up to 3500kg<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fuel capacity & consumption<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Up to 80 litres
\nDiesel Turbo 3.2 lt 8.8 lts per 100km
\nDiesel Twin turbo 2.0lt 8.2 lts per 100km
\nDiesel Turno 2.2 lt 9.2 lt per 100km<\/td>\n		Up to 80 litres
\nIL4 Diesel 2.0 lts 7.2 lts per 100km
\nIL4 Diesel 2.0 lts 7.2 lts per 100km
\nV6 Diesel 3.0 lts 8.4 lts per 100km<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Other specifications<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6 speed manual or up to 10 speed Auto
\nOverall height\/width 1839\/2113
\nOverall length\/wheelbase 5340\/3150
\nTray L1581 x W1560 x D475 mm
\nTotal payload capability 1021kg (Approx)
\n*Subject to change based on configuration<\/td>\n		10 speed Auto
\nOverall height\/width 1884\/1918
\nOverall length\/wheelbase 5370\/3270
\nTray Lxxx x Wxxxx x Dxxx mm
\nTotal payload capability 934kg (Approx)
\nNCAP safety rating x\/5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capability<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Angle of: (degrees)
\nApproach 30′ Departure 25′ Breakover 24′
\nMinimum ground clearance xxxmm
\nWater Fording depth 600mm Max
\n4WD system: Part time 4WD High & Low range
\n*Subject to change based on configuration<\/td>\n		Varies dependent on configuration.
\nAngle of: (degrees)
\nApproach xx Departure xx Breakover xx
\nMinimum ground clearance 234 mm
\nWater Fording depth xxx mm Max
\n4WD system: 2WD or AWD<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Performance<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pricing (Dual-Cab)
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2020 47,290 – 77,190 AUD
\n2018 Approx $50,400 – 74,390 AUD
\n4×4 Dual Cab<\/td>\n		2023 From $50,000 – $72,000
\nRanger Raptor From $87,000
\n2018 From $50,000 AUD XLS 4×2
\nDual Cab 4WD<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
*Specs change due to model grade and configuration. Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change!<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

VS Welcome to the old Ford Ranger (2023) vs new Ford Ranger (2024) comparison for 2023. Predictably as still hot from the factory in Thailand the new Ford Ranger is here and mostly out of stock! Things have change since the last set of ute and light Truck comparisons since 2019. For example the Mercedes […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,102,360,1],"tags":[852,269,851,853],"class_list":["post-12309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ford","category-ranger","category-truck-utes-and-commercial-vehicles","category-uncategorized","tag-2023-ford-ranger-vs-2024-ford-ranger-comparison","tag-ford-ranger","tag-ford-ranger-t6","tag-new-ford-ranger-compared-to-old-ford-ranger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12309"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12364,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12309\/revisions\/12364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}