{"id":12313,"date":"2023-06-02T22:52:40","date_gmt":"2023-06-02T12:52:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/?p=12313"},"modified":"2023-06-02T22:52:40","modified_gmt":"2023-06-02T12:52:40","slug":"ford-ranger-vs-mitsubishi-triton-comparison","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/ford-ranger-vs-mitsubishi-triton-comparison\/","title":{"rendered":"Ford Ranger Vs Mitsubishi Triton Comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n
\n

\"Ford
Ford Ranger (2024)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n
VS<\/td>\n\n

\"Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi Triton<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Welcome to the new Ford Ranger Vs Mitsubishi Triton comparison for 2023. This was the comparison we where keen to write about due to our long running ‘best package’ award for the Triton. While the Ford Ranger is heavily revised inside and out the Triton only scored a exterior facelift. So how does the latest Ford Ranger compare to the old favourite Mitsubishi Triton.<\/p>\n

Ford Ranger Vs Mitsubishi Triton exterior comparison: It’s a simple decision for us and it is the Triton that is the best looking. The Ford Ranger despite having newer refresh is sort of ordinary in terms of looks. It is only the Ranger’s larger size that standout and the old lines that more you look at it.<\/p>\n

Ford Ranger Vs Mitsubishi Triton interior comparison: The Rangers interior is quite nice but like the exterior the more you look the more you see and feel parts that are a little less than precise than it should be. The large screens are a standout in the class and gives it a more upmarket look. The Triton’s interior does not match the exterior that’s for sure. It’s very 90’s in terms of design but the best part is the ability customise. While the steering wheel is the nicest part the rest but the appointments are dated but has the same features as the Ranger.<\/p>\n

Ford Ranger Vs Mitsubishi Triton engine and technology comparison: The Ranger has a variety of engines, model variants and grades to choose from. The engine choices are pretty good but due to the extra weight not as good as they should be. In comparison the Triton just has the one option that is good for it’s size and weight. Both play the model grade features game hence difficult to compare safety and gadget list.<\/p>\n

Ford Ranger Vs Mitsubishi Triton street cred comparison: Once again both have decent street cred but the larger Ranger and Raptor variant will always have the edge. No matter how many largely superfluous bits you add to the outside.<\/p>\n

The winner of the Ford Ranger Vs Mitsubishi Triton comparison is a draw. The Triton is still the value for money package. Lots of features and a proper 4WD system and easy to customise interior. It’s only real flaw is the aged interior. In comparison the Ford Ranger is larger with a modern interior and user interface but less efficient and the size makes it more difficult to drive in traffic, park and generally more difficult to manage. Sure it may be more refined but at a much higher cost.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Ford Ranger<\/strong><\/td>\nMitsubishi Triton<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\"\"<\/td>\n\"\"<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Engines<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
IL4 Cylinder Diesel
\n2 Litre (1996cc)
\nSingle Turbo IC DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 125Kw @ 3500 RPM
\nClaimed 405Nm @ 1750 RPM<\/td>\n		IL4 Turbo Diesel
\nTurbo DOHC 16 VVT EFI DI CR
\n2.4 Litre (2477cc)
\nClaimed 133Kw @ 3500 RPM
\nClaimed 430Nm @ 2500 RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
IL4 Cylinder Diesel
\n2 Litre (1996cc)
\nTwin Turbo IC DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 154Kw @ 3750 RPM
\nClaimed 500Nm @ 1750 RPM<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
V6 Cylinder Diesel
\n3.0 Litre (2993cc) Diesel
\nTurbo DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 184Kw @ 3250 RPM
\nClaimed 600Nm @ 1750 RPM<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ranger Raptor (Mod)
\nV6 Cylinder Petrol
\n3.0 Litre (2993cc)
\nTurbo DOHC EFI DI CR
\nClaimed 292Kw @ 5650 RPM
\nClaimed 583Nm @ 3500 RPM<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Weight<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FROM 2200 Kg (4×4)
\nTowing capacity up to 3500kg<\/td>\n		FROM 1990 Kg
\nTowing capacity up to 3100kg<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fuel capacity & consumption<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Up to 80 litres
\nIL4 Diesel 2.0 lts 7.2 lts per 100km
\nIL4 Diesel 2.0 lts 7.2 lts per 100km
\nV6 Diesel 3.0 lts 8.4 lts per 100km<\/td>\n		Up to 75 litres
\nIL4 Diesel 8.6 lts per 100km<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Other specifications<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10 speed Auto
\nOverall height\/width 1884\/1918
\nOverall length\/wheelbase 5370\/3270
\nTray Lxxx x Wxxxx x Dxxx mm
\nTotal payload capability 934kg (Approx)
\nNCAP safety rating x\/5<\/td>\n		6 speed manual or 6 speed Auto
\nOverall height\/width 1795\/1815
\nOverall length\/wheelbase 5300\/3000
\nTray L1520 x W1470 x D475 mm
\nTotal payload capability 906kg (Approx)
\nNCAP safety rating 5\/5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capability<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Varies dependent on configuration.
\nAngle of: (degrees)
\nApproach xx Departure xx Breakover xx
\nMinimum ground clearance 234 mm
\nWater Fording depth xxx mm Max
\n4WD system: 2WD or AWD<\/td>\n		Angle of: (degrees)
\nApproach 28′ Departure 23′ Breakover 25′
\nMinimum ground clearance 220mm
\nWater Fording depth 500mm Max
\n2WD or 4WD or AWD \u00a0with Low Range<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Performance<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pricing (Dual-Cab)
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dual Cab 4×4 price guide
\n2023 From $50,000 – $72,000
\nRanger Raptor From $87,000
\n2018 From $50,000 AUD XLS 4×2
\nDual Cab 4WD<\/td>\n		Dual Cab 4×4 price guide
\n2023 $41,500 – 56,500 AUD Dual Cab 4×4
\n2020 $36,490 – 52,470 AUD Dual Cab 4×4
\n2019 $35,490 – 51,990 AUD Dual Cab 4×4
\n2018 From $38,000 – 48,000 AUD 4×4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
*Specs change due to model grade and configuration. Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change!<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

VS Welcome to the new Ford Ranger Vs Mitsubishi Triton comparison for 2023. This was the comparison we where keen to write about due to our long running ‘best package’ award for the Triton. While the Ford Ranger is heavily revised inside and out the Triton only scored a exterior facelift. So how does the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,23,102,91,360],"tags":[269,859,246],"class_list":["post-12313","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ford","category-mitsubishi","category-ranger","category-triton","category-truck-utes-and-commercial-vehicles","tag-ford-ranger","tag-ford-ranger-vs-mitsubishi-triton-comparison","tag-mitsubishi-triton"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12313","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12313"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12313\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12401,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12313\/revisions\/12401"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12313"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12313"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12313"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}