{"id":5724,"date":"2015-05-08T10:23:35","date_gmt":"2015-05-08T10:23:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/?p=5724"},"modified":"2016-10-14T11:16:09","modified_gmt":"2016-10-14T11:16:09","slug":"mazda-cx-3-vs-honda-hr-v-comparison","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/mazda-cx-3-vs-honda-hr-v-comparison\/","title":{"rendered":"Mazda CX-3 Vs Honda HR-V Comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n
\n

\"2015_cx3_1\"
Mazda CX-3<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n
VS<\/td>\n\n

\"2015_hrv_1\"
Honda HR-V<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

This is the new Mazda CX-3 Vs Honda HR-V comparison. These are two of the newest small SUVs in the class for 2015. We regard both highly (already) and considering that both manufacturers where the leading global manufacturers 20 years ago making cars that virtually matched the traditional Europeans and exceeded the American brands. Of course history goes that Mazda stuffed up financially and Honda self destructed being saved by its motorcycle division and then the American market for nice but average cars in the Accord and CR-V. Both are climbing back on the competitive ladder so here’s a comparison of the latest ‘clean sheet’ efforts.<\/p>\n

Mazda CX-3 Vs Honda HR-V exterior: Both are styled according to their brand’s current design language. We prefer the Mazda CX-3 as it looks more up to date. The HR-V’s design looks a like it was designed a few years earlier but still looks smart. We do like both overall. The CX-3 is based on the Mazda2 while the HR-V is based on the Honda Jazz.<\/p>\n

Mazda CX-3 Vs Nissan Qashqai interior: First of all the Honda’s interior design looks pretty good but instead of following the trend of it’s layered and very impressive dash designs in other models the HR-V uses a completely different design, something as could easily be from Toyota for example. It is a conservative design but it does look and feel good for the class. The CX-3 uses the same design as the latest Mazda 2 and even the forthcoming MX-5. Trimmed differently in each model Mazda’s interior design is essentially looks good and works well it also saves a lot of cash when designing a new car. The top range CX-3 is really nice place to be in but at a high cost. In the end we prefer the CX-3’s interior as it has less noticeable cheaper parts and access to optional trim packs that lift it beyond the competition. That said the HR-V has magic seats which make it the most practical smallish SUV available.<\/p>\n

Mazda CX-3 Vs Honda HR-V engine and technology:\u00a0The Maxda CX-3 has arguably the best engine\/transmission and tech package in the small SUV class but it is a carry over form the CX-5. The Honda HR-V has essentially carry over engine and CVT transmission hence this is a commuter focused. Safety and convenience packs rate a mention and the HR-V has more. Thankfully both have the same engines regardless of which model grade you pick which is fantastic (apart from the diesel option in the CX3).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The conclusion is relatively easy. The Honda is an everyday commuter which its amazing practical interior vs the CX-3 sporty presentation and features. \u00a0The HR-V was arguably one of the best new smallish SUV definitely more practical but does not feel as good as the CX-3 and that’s even before we drive it.\u00a0Since the CX-3 has virtually all the ‘wants’ and ‘desirable’ features ticked it is probably the better choice. The knock out punch though is the price, entry level CX-3 is under $20K admittedly the top range CX-3 is just as good as other SUV costing much more. However in the main affordable models in the CX-3 range makes the HR-V look overpriced. We pick the CX-3 if shopping against the HR-V this time. It’s tough when these are definitely two of the best small SUVs.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n