{"id":9405,"date":"2020-05-29T22:58:13","date_gmt":"2020-05-29T12:58:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/?p=9405"},"modified":"2020-05-29T22:58:13","modified_gmt":"2020-05-29T12:58:13","slug":"mazda-cx-30-vs-nissan-juke-comparison","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/mazda-cx-30-vs-nissan-juke-comparison\/","title":{"rendered":"Mazda CX-30 Vs Nissan Juke Comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"<table border=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><figure id=\"attachment_9971\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-9971\" style=\"width: 260px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-9971 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/mazda_cx30_1.jpg\" alt=\"Mazda CX-30\" width=\"260\" height=\"170\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-9971\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Mazda CX-30<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n<td>VS<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><figure id=\"attachment_2401\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2401\" style=\"width: 260px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-2401 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/juke_1.jpg\" alt=\"Nissan Juke\" width=\"260\" height=\"170\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2401\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Nissan Juke<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>This is the Mazda CX-30 Vs Nissan Juke comparison for 2020. The Juke was the first of the stylish small SUVs and despite being a 10 year old design still looks fresh. It&#8217;s mostly unjustified comparing the CX-30 against the Nissan Juke for a few reasons, they are pricing, size and that a all new Juke will be released within the next 12 months. However the Juke in it&#8217;s original guise is still on sale and pricing does overlap between the two models.<\/p>\n<p>Mazda CX-30 Vs Nissan Juke exterior comparison: The Juke is a good design although polarising but it works and hasn&#8217;t aged like other cars its age e.g.. Mitsubishi ASX from 10 years ago. The CX-30 is a sporty looking car although some will think it is conservative. We like both for these reasons. The Juke may be the smaller car but it looks bigger than it is.<\/p>\n<p>Mazda CX-30 Vs Nissan Juke interior comparison: The interior of the Juke looks great but the materials are mostly hard plastics of not the best grade. As a result it does look and feel cheap in places but Nissan have done a great job in the design that like it&#8217;s exterior still looks great after so many years. Unless you sit in the CX-30 you would honestly think the Juke is pretty good for the price. The CX-30 in general has a very good interior of the price. It is a level above the price where it counts. The higher the model grade the better the CX-30 is.<\/p>\n<p>Mazda CX-30 Vs Nissan Juke engine and technology comparison: The Juke is a surprising package in terms of equipment and engines. A small decent power turbo engine for most of the range followed by a larger turbo powered for significantly more power than the entire small SUV class than you get the NISMO enhanced version. We usually frown at turbo tuning but the Juke has more changes which justifies viewing it as a separate model. By all accounts to those who drive agree that it is a drivers car rather and one foot drivers the the entire class consists of. Nissan Should be applauded, if only they released it years ago. The CX-30 has shared engines with other Mazdas along with extensive safety systems list all very sensible choices.<\/p>\n<p>Mazda CX-30 Vs Nissan Juke Street cred\u00a0: A Juke NISMO RS will have those into JDM cars wondering if its the real thing as they didn&#8217;t realise the model exists. Furthermore it&#8217;s just not the cosmetic package with stickers. A real NISMO, well as real as you can get from the showroom. To be honest the regular Juke is probably on par with the CX-30.<\/p>\n<p>The conclusion and winner of the Mazda CX-30 Vs Nissan Juke comparison is a draw. In general the CX-30 is the better buy for 2020 style refinement and quality with just enough speed to add interest and some substance to the look. It&#8217;s a no drainer with an automatic, so as good as any other in commuting and traffic. The Nissan Juke is still not the mainstream purchase due to it&#8217;s &#8216;different&#8217; looks although all the hardware is there for an up to date small SUV. While the normal Juke is for commuting, the NISMO RS variant is for drivers as it is more difficult to drive, rather you have to take the time to drive it. Since the option is there and Nissan should be applauded for releasing it. Although available in Automatic the vocal masses who can&#8217;t drive anything else but an automatic will complain like wise the mainstream self proclaimed reputable websites don&#8217;t understand that this is the future. No one will look back and proclaim the CX-30 a classic, where as in 20 years the Juke NISMO RS has the chance at being part of the JDM collectables.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table style=\"width: 700px; height: 1435px;\" border=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 29px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 29px; width: 690.015625px;\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><script>\/\/ <![CDATA[ google_ad_client = \"ca-pub-2027171236681273\"; \/* MotorBLOG HLink Unit 1 *\/ google_ad_slot = \"6842347948\"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; \/\/ ]]><\/script><script src=\"http:\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/show_ads.js\">\/\/ <![CDATA[ \/\/ ]]><\/script><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><span style=\"color: #446d8c;\"><b>Mazda CX-30<\/b><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><span style=\"color: #446d8c;\"><b>Nissan Juke\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 177px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 177px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-9972\" src=\"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/mazda_cx30_2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"260\" height=\"170\" \/><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 177px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2402\" src=\"http:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/juke_4.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"260\" height=\"170\" \/><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><span style=\"color: #446d8c;\"><strong>Engines<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 120px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 120px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">IL4 Cylinder Petrol<br \/>\nDOHC VVT EFI<br \/>\n2.0 Litre (1998cc)<br \/>\nClaimed 114Kw @ 6000RPM<br \/>\nClaimed 200Nm @ 4000RPM<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 120px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">4 Cylinder Turbo Petrol (2015)<br \/>\n1.2 Litre (1197cc) 95 Octane<br \/>\nDOHC VVT EFI<br \/>\nClaimed 85Kw @ 4500RPM<br \/>\nClaimed 190Nm @ 2000RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 120px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 120px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">4 Cylinder\u00a0petrol (91 Octane)<br \/>\n2.5 Litre (2488cc)<br \/>\nDOHC VVT EFI<br \/>\nClaimed 139Kw @ 6000RPM<br \/>\nClaimed 252Nm @ 4000RPM<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 120px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">4 Cylinder Turbo Petrol<br \/>\n1.6 Litre (1618cc) 95 Octane<br \/>\nDOHC VVT EFI<br \/>\nClaimed 140Kw @ 6000RPM<br \/>\nClaimed 240Nm @ 2000RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; width: 311.140625px;\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; width: 372.875px;\">4 Cylinder Turbo Petrol (NISMO RS)<br \/>\n1.6 Litre (1618cc) 95 Octane<br \/>\nDOHC VVT EFI<br \/>\nClaimed 1627Kw @ 6000RPM<br \/>\nClaimed 250Nm @ 2400RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><span style=\"color: #446d8c;\"><strong>Weight<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 48px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 48px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">Up to 51 litres<br \/>\nIL4 2.0 Petrol 6.5 litres per 100km<br \/>\nIL4 2.5 Petrol 6.6 litres per 100km<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 48px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">Kerb weight FROM 1160Kg<br \/>\nTowing capacity up to 1200kg<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><span style=\"color: #446d8c;\"><strong>Fuel capacity &amp; consumption<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 96px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 96px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">6 speed Auto<br \/>\nOverall height\/width 1540\/1795<br \/>\nOverall length\/wheelbase 4395\/2655<br \/>\n4WD system: FWD or AWD on Demand<br \/>\nANCAP Safety: 5\/5<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 96px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">Up to 46 &#8211; 50 litres (95 Octane)<br \/>\nIL4 1.2 Turbo 7.4 litres per 100km (petrol)<br \/>\nIL4 1.6 Turbo 6.3 litres per 100km (petrol)<br \/>\nIL4 1.6 NISMO RS 7.3 litres per 100km (petrol)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><span style=\"color: #446d8c;\"><strong>Other specifications<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 120px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 120px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">8 Speed Auto<br \/>\nOverall height\/width 1658\/1910<br \/>\nOverall length\/wheelbase 4425\/2705<br \/>\n4WD system: FWD or AWD<br \/>\nANCAP Safety: 5\/5<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 120px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">6 speed manual or CVT Auto<br \/>\nOverall height\/width 1565\/1765<br \/>\nOverall length\/wheelbase 4135\/2530<br \/>\n4WD system: FWD or AWD<br \/>\nANCAP Safety: 5\/5<br \/>\nTyre size: 215-55-15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><span style=\"color: #446d8c;\"><strong>Capability <\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 96px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 96px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">Angle of: (degrees)<br \/>\nApproach xx Departure xx Breakover xx<br \/>\nGround clearance (unloaded) 175mm<br \/>\nWater Fording depth xxmm Max<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 96px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">Angle of: (degrees)<br \/>\nApproach xx Departure xx Breakover xx<br \/>\nGround clearance (unloaded) 180 mm<br \/>\nWater Fording depth xxmm Max<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><span style=\"color: #446d8c;\"><strong>Performance<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 48px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 48px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 48px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">1.2 Petrol Turbo 0-100kph 10 secs<br \/>\n1.6 Petrol Turbo 0-100kph 8 secs<br \/>\n1.6 NISMO RS 0-100kph 7 secs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><span style=\"color: #446d8c;\"><strong>Pricing<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 24px; width: 372.875px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 120px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 120px; width: 311.140625px;\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\">2020 $29,990 &#8211; 43,490 AUD<br \/>\n*Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change!<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 120px; width: 372.875px;\" align=\"left\" valign=\"top\">2020 FROM $23,490 &#8211; 30,490 AUD<br \/>\n2020 NISMO RS $34,490 &#8211; 37,490 AUD<br \/>\n2016\u00a0FROM $23,490 &#8211; 33,490 AUD<br \/>\n2015 FROM $22,990 &#8211; 32,490 AUD<br \/>\n2013 FROM $21,990 &#8211; 32,190 AUD<br \/>\n*Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change!<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 29px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: left; height: 29px; width: 690.015625px;\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><script>\/\/ <![CDATA[ google_ad_client = \"ca-pub-2027171236681273\"; \/* MotorBLOG HLink Unit 2 *\/ google_ad_slot = \"5105621021\"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; \/\/ ]]><\/script><script src=\"http:\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/show_ads.js\">\/\/ <![CDATA[ \/\/ ]]><\/script><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>VS This is the Mazda CX-30 Vs Nissan Juke comparison for 2020. The Juke was the first of the stylish small SUVs and despite being a 10 year old design still looks fresh. It&#8217;s mostly unjustified comparing the CX-30 against the Nissan Juke for a few reasons, they are pricing, size and that a all [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[560,98,51,20,6],"tags":[177,565,585,138,199,586],"class_list":["post-9405","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cx-30","category-juke","category-mazda","category-nissan","category-small-suv-reviews","tag-mazda-2","tag-mazda-cx-30","tag-mazda-cx-30-vs-nissan-juke-comparison","tag-nissan-2","tag-nissan-juke","tag-nissan-juke-rs-nismo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9405","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9405"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9405\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10168,"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9405\/revisions\/10168"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9405"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9405"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dixonarchive.com\/motorblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9405"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}