Mazda CX-9 Vs Subaru Outback 2016 Comparison

VS

Welcome to the new Mazda CX-9 Vs Subaru Outback comparison for 2016. We only checked out the revised Subaru Outback recently so it’s impressions are still reasonably fresh in our minds likewise the Mazda CX-9 from last week.  Both are not small SUVs hence should be described as medium sized although they are the largest size that each manufacturer currently offers.. The segment is growing in model numbers as the sales sweet point is currently family sized SUVs. That said ,the small SUV category is gaining momentum as of 2016 thanks to some very clever new models.

Mazda CX-9 Vs Subaru Outback exterior comparison: The new CX-9 it a good looking car regardless of which model in the range you are after. That said the higher in the range the better it gets. The Subaru Outback still looks good too despite it’s age but old school design touches and design themes borrowed for parent company Toyota show. The additional of higher suspension and tyres along with a truck load of plastic bits make it like a traditional 4WD which we think adds to the appeal.  Since very few manufacturer still make wagon versions of their cars it’s always good to see what Subaru can offer. There is only one Outback model with 99% the same looks so your can’t really tell at a glance which model you’ve got. Of course if you’re a car spotter like we are, the sunroof and one additional chrome strip on the top range and of course the small badging. The Mazda CX-9 is clearly bigger than the Subaru and side by side is quite telling.

Mazda CX-9 Vs Subaru Outback interior comparison: The recently revised interior in the Outback is best described as good but a sideways step compared to the prior design. The Outback interior is a very ordinary design to look at especially compared to the new CX-9. Not much more needs to be said since it is an easy win to the Mazda.

Mazda CX-9 Vs Subaru Outback engines and technology: The Subaru Outback has a lot of safety and convenience features expected for the price the only issue is the CVT transmission that while very smooth lacks the character especially in the powerhouse 6 cylinder version and makes the standard 2.4 petrol feels underpowered next to any SUV without a CVT. The Mazda CX-9 thankfully has the one engine option and they have avoided the rip off tactic of having the same engine with different turbo settings. You get the same high power turbo 4 cylinder regardless of model grade. Although the CX-9 does not have a diesel option it is not a disadvantage due to lower overall running costs of the petrol engine.

Mazda CX-9 Vs Subaru Outback road test: The Outback has a great ride and quiet interior the handling was boring and enjoyment hampered by the usually ‘wanting to always go straight’ dive system. Default cutting corners setup is not safe and the steering is not abrupt when trying to enjoy cornering a round about smoothly for example. We haven’t driven the new CX-9 yet.

The Mazda CX-9 is definitely the better package showroom and spec wise regardless of model grade you choose. The Subaru Outback is a good effort and becoming more like a Toyota wagon company, being good at everything with the standard but annoying AWD system. The Outback is good value for your money if you want a reasonably sized SUV but it is essentially anonymous. So in the end your choice will depend on your garage height, exterior and interior design preference as the price is comparable except for the top range models of course.

Mazda CX-9	Subaru Outback
Engines
IL 4 Cylinder Turbo DOHC VVT EFI 2.5 Litre (2488cc) Claimed 170Kw @ 5000 RPM Claimed 420Nm @ 2000 RPM	IL4 Cylinder Petrol DOHC 16 Valve 2.5 Litre (2459cc) Claimed 129Kw @ 5800 RPM Claimed 235Nm @ 4000 RPM
	IL4 Cylinder Diesel DI CR 2.0 Litre (1990cc) Claimed 110Kw @ 3600 RPM Claimed 350Nm @ 1600 RPM
	F6 Cylinder Petrol DOHC 16 Valve 3.6 Litre (3590cc) Claimed 191Kw @ 6000 RPM Claimed 350Nm @ 4400 RPM
Weight
From 1924Kg Towing capacity up to 2000g	Kerb weight FROM 1700Kg Towing capacity up to 1700Kg
Fuel capacity & consumption
72 litres – 95 Octane IL4 Turbo 8.4 litres per 100km	Up to 60 litres IL4 Diesel 5.7 litres per 100km (Auto) F4 Petrol 7.3 litres per 100km (Auto) F6 Petrol 9.9 litres per 100km (Auto)
Other specifications
6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1747/1969 Overall length/wheelbase 5075/2930 NCAP safety rating 5/5 Tyre size: 255-60-18	CVT Auto Overall height/width 1675/1840 Overall length/wheelbase 4815/2745 NCAP safety rating 5/5
Capability
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Minimum ground clearance 175 mm Water Fording depth xxxmm Max 4WD system: Front WD or AWD	Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Min ground clearance xxx mm Water Fording depth xxxmm Max 4WD system: AWD
Performance
Pricing
2016 $42,490 – 63,390 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc…	2016 $35,990 – 48,490 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change!