|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to the Mazda BT-50 vs Ford Ranger comparison for 2018. With the refresh of both models for 2018 we decided to have another comparison to see which one is better. Both are based on the same underbody design but with significant visual differences. More so all past models share the same design for over around 20 years. The Mazda B series and Bravo one tonne utes where shared with the Ford Ranger for nearly 20 years but only this generation did the differences become obvious. This comparison focused to the Dual-cab 4WD models as it is the most popular however the Hi-Rider versions of both models which have raised suspension and only 2WD are very popular as well.
Mazda BT-50 vs Ford Ranger exterior comparison: The BT-50 is a modern looking SUV and Japanese in terms of design. The squared off front end makes the BT-50 look more conservative compared to the prior model but not a forward step. It’s probably because the most are the buyers want that sort of look. However the change is so minor we didn’t update our usual model graphic. The Ford Ranger despite being built the same platform looks quite different as it is square off from the star and they have tried to use styling clues from the F150 their most popular model. Unfortunately it doesn’t really work and side by side the Ranger looks like it’s own unrelated model. The High Rider versions of both Ranger and BT-50 have the raised suspension but only 2WD and they are cheaper by $5000 which is appealing if you only need 2WD or like the faux 4WD look. Finally the top range Sidetrack Ranger with it’s thin plastic trim and cheap looking alloy wheels is terrible.
Mazda BT-50 vs Ford Ranger interior comparison: The BT-50 interior is deigned in the same theme as the prior generation Mazda cars and as a result look good. However the quality of materials are more commercial with clear hard plastics, feel and ambience. This is fine if you want more a commercial ute than a passenger car. Thankfully the materials get better as you go up the model grades but it’s not really enough. The Ranger interior is really boring with lots of blank space but the instruments and stereo system along with various trim packs to make it more modern and nicer place to be in. However the higher quality and soft touch plastics make the cabin more inviting the the BT-50 and so in the end we definitely prefer the Ranger interior.
Mazda BT-50 vs Ford Ranger engines and technology comparison: Both have the same diesel engine only and in two options in 2018 and the same variety of safety systems dependent on model grade including auto emergency brakes. Both require the safety pack to be optioned though. Unfortunately there a few key missing features you’d expect as standard in large vehicles and that is parking sensors. There are so many variants of the BT-50 and the Ranger that basic exterior dimensions differ there’s no real point comparing. We scanned the spec sheets for both and are most equal in terms of tech and options. However there is one key factor that can sway the buying decision in favour of the BT-50 and that is the Alpine stereo system that can be be updated relatively easily or replaced. The ability to customise the interior means that it will be more current for longer.
Mazda BT-50 vs Ford Ranger drive comparison: N/A
To conclude the winner of the Mazda BT-50 Vs Ford Ranger comparison is the Mazda BT-50. As much of the Ford PR would like us to believe, the Ranger is not related to the popular F150. Sure it has Ford truck styling clues but it requires lots of after market styling add ons to vaguely meet the iconic F150 design. The BT-50 is cheaper to buy with more options to style, sure it’s not a Ford truck but if you’re a buyer who wants value for money than it is easily the better and more customisable truck to buy. After all this comparison is not about marketing or branding.
Note that the specifications are for the most popular variant the 4×4 Dual-cab.
| Mazda BT-50 | Ford Ranger |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| IL5 Cylinder Diesel 3.2 Litre (3198cc) Diesel Turbo DOHC EFI DI CR Claimed 147Kw @ 3000 RPM Claimed 470Nm @ 1750 RPM |
IL5 Cylinder Diesel 3.2 Litre (3198cc) Diesel Turbo DOHC EFI DI CR Claimed 147Kw @ 3000 RPM Claimed 470Nm @ 1750 RPM |
| 2.2 Litre (2198cc) Diesel Turbo DOHC EFI DI CR Claimed 110Kw @ 3700 RPM Claimed 375Nm @ 1500-2500 RPM |
2.2 Litre (2198cc) Diesel Turbo DOHC EFI DI CR Claimed 118Kw @ 3200 RPM Claimed 385Nm @ 1600 RPM |
| Weight | |
| FROM 2047 Kg Towing capacity up to 3500kg |
FROM 2000 Kg Towing capacity up to 3500kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 80 litres 3.2 Diesel 9.7 lts per 100km |
Up to 80 litres Diesel 2.2lts 9.2 lts per 100km Diesel 3.2lts 8.3 lts per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 6 speed Auto or Manual Overall height/width 1815/1850 Overall length/wheelbase 5373/3220 Tray size: Variable NCAP safety rating 5/5 *Subject to change based on configuration |
6 speed manual or 6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1800/1815 Overall length/wheelbase 5362/3220 Tray size: Variable NCAP safety rating 5/5 *Subject to change based on configuration |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover N/A Minimum ground clearance xxx mm Water Fording depth 500mm Max 4WD or 2WD Subject to change based on configuration |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover N/A Minimum ground clearance xxx mm Water Fording depth 500mm Max 4WD or 2WD Subject to change based on configuration |
| Performance | |
| Pricing (Dual-Cab) |
|
| 2018 Special $49,990 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc… |
2018 $45,750 – 61,115 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc… |