|
|
VS |
|
This is the new Suzuki Vitara Vs Mitsubishi ASX Comparison. The 2016 Mistubishi ASX in it’s current shape has been around since 2010 which is a very long time in car cycles but it is due for replacement in about 12 months. Mitsubishi is the weakest of the Japanese manufacturers at the moment which is surprising because none of its cars or SUVs we’ve driven or owned has always been pretty decent. The Triton Ute is a great Ute, The Pajero Sport is one of the best medium sized SUVs, the Outlander is pretty decent too.
Suzuki Vitara Vs Mitsubishi ASX exterior: To be completely honest both look very much alike. The Mitsubishi ASX appears to be inspired by the older Suzuki Grand Vitara where as the Vitara is clearly inspired but the Grand Vitara – yes takes a bit of understanding but you get the idea. Regardless the Suzuki looks the most modern but both use conservative sides and and aggressive front ends to make a difference. The ASX is sometimes awkward to look at but most of the time dependent on the wheel and tyre combination looks good but overall very conservative design. The Suzuki Vitara has the same issue but more obvious due to the wheel and tyre combination on some models.
Suzuki Vitara Vs Mitsubishi ASX interior: The interior of the ASX is pretty good for it’s age. Top range ASX was very normal in term of presentation when the quality of materials were also reasonable. Sure the ASX interior looks and feel is dated but it perfectly acceptable. The Vitara interior is a little hard to describe as the material consist of mainly hard plastics but they don’t look cheap and padding in the right areas it’s a decent place to be. We prefer the ASX interior.
Suzuki Vitara Vs Mitsubishi ASX engine and technology: The Suzuki Vitara has the latest turbo engine or diesel and regular gearbox which we enjoyed driving. There are plenty of standard for the class in 2016 safety features. The ASX is hampered by older engines although a diesel is available and a CVT gearbox. It’s and OK drive but requiring driving style adjustment, there’s none of the zippy feel small cars are about. Sfaety features are also normal for the class. Neither break any sort of technical boundaries with is OK for the nearly replaced ASX but a little disappointing for the much newer Vitara.
Suzuki Vitara Vs Mitsubishi ASX drive on the road: Suzuki Vitara drive was a surprise and the ASX was not – basically sums up the experience. The ASX felt good but the throttle and steering felt overall safe and required more less input than the Vitara to drive. In gear or CVT character makes the ASX feel underpowered. Both are reasonably smooth riding on the road and the ASX felt marginally smoother. Both have vibes but the ASX felt more solid to drive. Both definitely need additional safety system like blind spot and auto braking if they are going to succeed in 2017.
The conclusion is tricky and that’s because of pricing. The current Mistubishi ASX is a bargain compared to the other small SUVs. As a result the best value for money car to buy no question thanks to plenty of deals, ignore the recommended retail pricing as its usually less than the Vitara. It also looks good with nice looking alloy wheels as does not look like a cheap or base model SUV.
| Mitsubishi ASX | Suzuki Vitara |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| 4 Cylinder (4B11) 2.0 Litre (1998cc) petrol (91 Octane) DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 110Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 197Nm @ 4200RPM |
4 Cylinder petrol (K14C) 1.4 Litre (1373cc) 95 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 103Kw @ 5500 RPM Claimed 220Nm @ 1500 RPM |
| 4 Cylinder (4N13) 1.8 Litre (1798cc) diesel Turbo intercooled Common rail direct injection Claimed 110Kw @ 4000RPM Claimed 300Nm @ 2000RPM |
IL4 cylinder Diesel 1.6 Litre (1596cc) Turbo-charged – DI – CR Claimed 88kW @ 3750rpm Claimed 320Nm @ 1750rpm |
| 4 Cylinder (4N14) 2.2 Litre (2268cc) diesel Turbo intercooled Common rail direct injection Claimed 110Kw @ 3500RPM Claimed 300Nm @ 1500RPM |
4 Cylinder petrol (M16A) 1.6 Litre (1586cc) 91 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 86Kw @ 6000 RPM Claimed 156Nm @ 4400 RPM |
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight 1340 – 1525 Kg Towing capacity up to 1400kg |
From Approx Kerb weight 1075 Kg Towing capacity up to 1200kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 60 – 63 litres IL4 2.0 Petrol 7.7 litres per 100km IL4 1.8 Diesel 5.7 litres per 100km IL4 2.2 Diesel 5.8 litres per 100km |
Up to 47 litres IL4 1.6 Petrol 5.8 litres per 100km IL4 1.4 Petrol turbo 5.9 litres per 100km IL4 1.6 Diesel 4.9 litres per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 5 speed manual or CVT Auto Overall height/width 1615/1770 Overall length/Wheelbase 4295/2690 4WD system: FWD or AWD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 Tyre size: 215-60-17 |
5 or 6 speed Auto 5 speed Manual Overall height/width 1610/1775 Overall length/wheelbase 4175/2500 4WD system: None AWD or 2WD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 Tyre size: |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) xxxmm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) xxxmm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
| Performance | |
| – | – |
| Pricing | |
| 2016 $24,990 – 36,490 AUD 2015 $24,990 – 36,490 AUD 2013 $24,990 – 36,490 AUD |
2016 $21,990 – 35,990 AUD |