|
|
VS |
|
This is the new Suzuki Vitara Vs Nissan Juke comparison. Continuing on with our series of the comparisons featuring the Suzuki Vitara and its competitors this time we had another look at the Nissan Juke because most of use actually like it and they are in the same price range and class. The Nissan Juke was released in 2010 so has been around for a few years but it hasn’t which is a testament to the original design. More to the point the Juke still sells really well in key markets around the world.
Suzuki Vitara Vs Nissan Juke exterior comparison: The Juke when released it was the only ‘outrageous’ mainstream car or SUV design at the time. We liked it from the start as it was completely different yet looked good at the sometime. The stronger colours make the Juke look better so avoid white please unless you don’t like modern styling. The Juke has styling clues for all Nissan models notably Z370 and Micra not that it needs them to look any better. The Suzuki Vitara looks conservative in comparison to the Juke. We still prefer the Juke’s exterior styling.
Suzuki Vitara Vs Nissan Juke interior comparison: The Vitara interior is conservative, designed for utility and made from nice looking but still hard plastics. We like but it is ordinary compared to the Juke. The Nissan Juke interior is like it’s exterior, modern and odd but good looking and fill of cool design features. Both are about the same size although the squared off Vitara arguably is more practical but not by much. The quality of materials is also better in the Juke and definitely feels nicer to be in. The instrument graphics and lighting all geeky and channels Star Trek Next Generation Enterprise. We still like the Juke interior better as there’s nothing else like it.
Suzuki Vitara Vs Nissan Juke engine and technology comparison: No question the Nissan Juke has the most technology, form the GTR inspired AWD system all round cameras, lane, blind spot, tyre pressure warning and so forth. The only thing missing in 2016 is auto braking which is fine for now… Sure on the top range Juke’s have all the features but the rest of the range is quite good too and more so than the Vitara. The Juke also has the powerful 140Kw turbo but equipped with a CVT which is annoying. Regardless the one flaw in the Juke it is not enough to help the Vitara so the the Juke wins this part of the comparison.
Suzuki Vitara Vs Nissan Juke drive comparison: We like the way the Vitara drives – 1.4 turbo being the best choice. Have not driven the Juke yet but coming soon.
The Suzuki Vitara is the SUV it has just enough of everything to justify the price tag and buyer interest but only in isolation. The Nissan Juke is an even better priced with additional interior and safety features and power for $2500 less! So the winner of the Suzuki Vitara Vs Nissan Juke comparison is the Juke easy.
| Nissan Juke | Suzuki Vitara |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| 4 Cylinder Turbo Petrol (2015) 1.2 Litre (1197cc) 95 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 85Kw @ 4500RPM Claimed 190Nm @ 2000RPM |
4 Cylinder petrol (K14C) 1.4 Litre (1373cc) Turbo DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 103Kw @ 5500 RPM Claimed 220Nm @ 1500 RPM |
| 4 Cylinder Petrol 1.6 Litre (1598cc) 95 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 86Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 158Nm @ 4000RPM |
IL4 cylinder Diesel 1.6 Litre (1596cc) Turbo-charged – DI – CR Claimed 88kW @ 3750rpm Claimed 320Nm @ 1750rpm |
| 4 Cylinder Turbo Petrol 1.6 Litre (1618cc) 95 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 140Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 240Nm @ 2000RPM |
4 Cylinder petrol (M16A) 1.6 Litre (1586cc) 91 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 86Kw @ 6000 RPM Claimed 156Nm @ 4400 RPM |
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight FROM 1160Kg Towing capacity up to 1200kg |
From Approx Kerb weight 1075 Kg Towing capacity up to 1200kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 46 – 50 litres (95 Octane) IL4 1.6 Turbo 7.4 litres per 100km (petrol) IL4 1.6 6.3 litres per 100km (petrol) |
Up to 47 litres IL4 1.6 Petrol 5.8 litres per 100km IL4 1.4 Petrol turbo 5.9 litres per 100km IL4 1.6 Diesel 4.9 litres per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 6 speed manual or CVT Auto Overall height/width 1565/1765 Overall length/wheelbase 4135/2530 4WD system: FWD or AWD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 Tyre size: 215-55-15 |
5 or 6 speed Auto 5 speed Manual Overall height/width 1610/1775 Overall length/wheelbase 4175/2500 4WD system: None AWD or 2WD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 Tyre size: |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) xxxmm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) xxxmm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
| Performance | |
| 1.2 Petrol 0-100kph 10 secs 1.6 Petrol 0-100kph 10 secs 1.6 Petrol Turbo 0-100kph 8 secs |
– |
| Pricing | |
| 2016 FROM $23,490 – 33,490 AUD 2015 FROM $22,990 – 32,490 AUD 2013 FROM $21,990 – 32,190 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |
2016 $21,990 – 35,990 AUD |