|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to the Nissan Juke Vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison. The Nissan Juke is new (Late 2013) to Australia although it has been on sale for around 2 years overseas in which it has become a popular small SUV package but yet to be proven here being new to the market. Likewise the Mistubishi ASX has been around for a little longer but has yet to make its mark anywhere in the world.
Nissan Juke Vs Mitsubishi ASX exterior comparison: First off the Mitsubishi ASX has some good styling here and there but overall it is not an attractive car. Mitsubishi car designs in the last generation have been simply uninspiring. It is hard to believe that the French versions of the same car from Peugeot and Citroen are infinitely better looking and classy. You would not confuse them with the ASX donor car.
The Nissan Juke is still a unique design although has been around for a few years. We think the exterior design is one of those the sits on the fence between ugly and good looks and we hope that any future versions don’t go conservative like the poor Micra… We like the Juke’s look and what it represents and so do the kids.
Nissan Juke Vs Mitsubishi ASX interior: The interior design of the Juke is like its exterior! The curves and design features are modern and quite impressive from the mid range models onwards. The only problems with the Juke are 1 – Size, it is quite compact on the inside but without the typical SUV style storage holes and more hatchback. The sloping only effects boot size and 2 – The quality of materials on the main dashboard area, simply put its a bit on the cheap and hard side. Splashes of matching high tech cloth and color LCD screens lift the looks and distract you from the cheaper parts. An updated higher quality dash will give the Juke a higher rating.
The ASX interior is very plain to look at and sit in. Hard leather seats do not give an impression of luxury in the top range version but at least there are some parts here and there but it gets worse lower down the model range. Overall very conservative in looks and sparse but feels as expected. The ASX desperately needs an upgrade.
Nissan Juke Vs Mitsubishi ASX engine and technology : Both cars have modern engines in both diesel and petrol versions (where available). Both do not have additional fuel saving tech that say the new Mazda range has but you can assume that they will have similar enhancements in future models. The ASX is very ordinary overall and likewise the Nissan Juke until you get to the mid-range AWD models that is! The Juke has tech from the famous GTR for handling and the most powerful engine in the small SUV class.
Nissan Juke Vs Mitsubishi ASX drive: N/A
We looked at Mitsubishi’s entire range when we did this review and concluded that the current range are all quite unattractive cars. The ASX was quite good when released but ordinary in 2014. That said only the Triton utility has any design flair. No wonder the new Korean manufacturers are kicking goals and touch downs dependent which country your reading this from. It’s also quite expensive in base model trim so bargain hard.
The Nissan Juke wins this comparison. The base model is almost in the pricing sweet spot – it would make a great alternative small hatch back. The base ASX is overpriced compared to the Juke at this level. The only things that count against the Juke are the two things mentioned earlier. But regard it as a small hatchback and they can be forgiven. That said the top range Nissan Juke is for enthusiasts and is a good thing.
| Nissan Juke | Mitsubishi ASX |
|
|
|
| Engines | |
| 4 Cylinder Turbo Petrol 1.6 Litre (1618cc) 95 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 140Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 240Nm @ 2000RPM |
4 Cylinder (4B11) 2.0 Litre (1998cc) petrol (91 Octane) DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 110Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 197Nm @ 4200RPM |
| 4 Cylinder Petrol 1.6 Litre (1598cc) 95 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 86Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 158Nm @ 4000RPM |
4 Cylinder (4N13) 1.8 Litre (1798cc) diesel Turbo intercooled Common rail direct injection Claimed 110Kw @ 4000RPM Claimed 300Nm @ 2000RPM |
| 4 Cylinder Diesel (Europe only) 1.5 Litre (1461cc) DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 81Kw @ 4000RPM Claimed 158Nm @ 1750PM |
4 Cylinder (4N14) 2.2 Litre (2268cc) diesel Turbo intercooled Common rail direct injection Claimed 110Kw @ 3500RPM Claimed 300Nm @ 1500RPM |
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight Approx 1200Kg Towing capacity up to Approx 1200kg |
Kerb weight 1340 – 1525 Kg Towing capacity up to 1400kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 46 – 50 litres IL4 1.6 Turbo 7.4 litres per 100km (petrol) IL4 1.6 6.3 litres per 100km (petrol) IL4 1.5 4.8 litres per 100km (diesel) |
Up to 63 litres IL4 2.0 Petrol 7.7 litres per 100km IL4 1.8 Diesel 5.7 litres per 100km IL4 2.2 Diesel 5.8 litres per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 5 or 6 speed manual or CVT Auto Overall height/width 1565/1765 Overall length/wheelbase 4135/2530 4WD system: FWD or AWD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 Tyre size: 215-55-15 |
5 speed manual or CVT Auto Overall height/width 1615/1770 Overall length/Wheelbase 4295/2690 4WD system: FWD or AWD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 Tyre size: 215-60-17 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) 180mm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach 26 Departure 36 Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) 200mm Water Fording depth 550mm Max |
| Performance | |
| 1.5 Diesel 0-100kph 11.5secs 1.6 Petrol 0-100kph 8 secs 1.6 Petrol Turbo 0-100kph 8 secs |
0-100kph 10.9 Secs |
| Pricing | |
| 2013 FROM $21,990 – 32,190 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |
2013 $24,990 – 36,490 AUD |
