|
|
VS |
|
This is the new Mazda CX-3 Vs Nissan Qashqai comparison. Comparing our two favourite small SUVs is going to be quite challenging but we do enjoy it. Because both are our favourite small SUVs at the time of this post the conclusion is going to be interesting.
Mazda CX-3 Vs Nissan Qashqai exterior: We like the exterior styling of both cars, the CX-3 is based on existing Mazda Kodo themes which look good with a little bit of attitude and should handle the test of time. The Qashqai has a more traditionally sporty and attractive wedge shape. Both are good looking and choosing between the two will probably depend on what mood your in. The only factor is related to the actual physical size to which the CX-3 is a littler smaller than the Qashqai.
Mazda CX-3 Vs Nissan Qashqai interior: Both are designed in completely different ways. The CX-3 has the same style as the regular Mazda and even the new MX-5 which says that it’s a modern in style and finished with good quality materials probably the best in the class. The Qashqai is the same sort of materials too but a more traditional design than the Mazda. However due to the way the CX-3 was designed there is no impression of cheaper parts and the optional interior style pack are worth getting too! CX-3 has the better interior across the range and clearly the benchmark not for size but for quality and design.
Aside from style and materials there is a size difference. The CX-3 is smaller especially in the back seat. The angled rear door opening doesn’t help either. The Qashqai has the right amount of space and look to make it feel right at home when there are rear passengers involved.
Mazda CX-3 Vs Nissan Qashqai engine and technology: The CX-3 has the latest fuel saving tech in a non-turbo charged petrol engine. It is better than the modern but low tech in the Qashqai engine. Both cars have all the latest safety system but the smarter drive line in the Qashqai gets additional points and loses them again for a old tech rear end while the CX-3 has the better tech without the need for the extra driveline smarts and just as good without hem. The CVT in the Qashqai is great for traffic since the driveline is seamless although the engine noise on some occasions does annoy.
Mazda CX-3 Vs Nissan Qashqai drive: Coming soon.
The conclusion is difficult when trying to decide which is the best outright SUV. So in the end if you are just a couple without no kids and occasional need to carry a few people then the CX-3 is the perfect choice. If you have a young or small family then the Qashqai is better then the CX-3. Both start are great prices but the $19,990 CX-3 entry price is very convincing.
| Mazda CX-3 | Nissan Qashqai |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| SKYACTIV-G IL4 Cylinder Petrol DOHC EFI 2.0 Litre (1998cc) Claimed 109Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 192Nm @ 2800PM |
4 Cylinder Petrol MR20 2 Litre (1997cc) 91 Octane DOHC EFI Claimed 106Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 200Nm @ 4400RPM |
| SKYACTIV-D IL4 cylinder Diesel 1.5 Litre (1499cc) Turbo-charged – DI – CR Claimed 77kW @ 4000rpm Claimed 270Nm @ 1600rpm |
4 Cylinder Diesel R9M 1.6 Litre (1598cc) DI Turbo diesel Claimed 96Kw @ 4000RPM Claimed 320Nm @ 1750RPM |
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight FROM 1332Kg Towing capacity up to 1200Kg |
Kerb weight FROM 1371Kg Towing capacity up to 1400kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| 44 litres 2.0 litre Petrol: 6.7 litres per 100km 1.5 Litre Diesel: 5.1 litres per 100km |
Up to 65 litres IL4 2.0 litre Petrol 7.7 litres per 100km IL4 1.6 litre Diesel 4.9 litres per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1550/1765 Overall length/wheelbase 4275/2570 Drive system: On demand AWD or 2WD Tyre size: 215-50-18 215-60-16 NCAP safety rating 5/5 |
6 speed manual or CVT Auto Overall height/width 1595/1806 Overall length/wheelbase 4377/2646 4WD system: None ANCAP Safety: 5/5 Tyre size: 215-60-17 or 225-45-19 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Trailhawk version only! Approach 29.9 Departure 32.2 Breakover 22.9 Ground clearance (unloaded Trailhawk only) 221 mm Water Fording depth 508mm Max |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) xxxmm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
| Performance | |
| – | – |
| Pricing | |
| 2015$19,990 – 37,990 AUD | 2014 FROM $25,990 – 37,990 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |