|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to the all new Hyundai Kona Vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison for 2017. The Kona is a good looking small SUV with a competitive price namely exactly the same as it’s competitors which is great for a brand new model which is usually higher priced. Unfortunately the Kona brand has already been used by a particular brand of coffee bean from Hawaii.
Hyundai Kona Vs Mitsubishi ASX exterior comparison: The new Kona is a good looking SUV with all the latest styling themes and traditional 1980’s style flared plastic guards in the same vein as the Subaru XV. This much external plastic on the Kona means that it will date quickly due mainly to fading but at the same time less prone to car park damage. In contrast the ASX is looking a little old with an over abundance of chrome that it was arguably never designed to be equipped with. The ASX has never been a pretty car best described as a regular small SUV that with a aggressive front end.
Hyundai Kona Vs Mitsubishi ASX interior comparison:The Hyundai Kona interior is a contrast to the exterior. It makes no attempt to hide the fact that this is the cheapest small SUV that they make. While the Kona’s interior is modern in design it does look and feel cheap compared to it’s competition. The centre screen is the cheapest looking and feeling one we’ve seen to date. The hard plastics on the lower models are disappointing some edges looks unfinished, the hard elbow rest on the drivers door on cheaper model reminds you every time that you’re in a cheap SUV. The ASX interior has it’s fair share of cheapness but it looks and feel better than the equivalent Kona model.
Hyundai Kona Vs Mitsubishi ASX engines and and technology comparison: The Kona being the latest model is not as advanced as you’d expect compared to the near decade old ASX. The Kona has a modern basic like much button start, climate control, auto wipers and lights however only the top range model has all the desirable safety systems standard. The base model has a safety pack as an option which is nice to know. The ASX likewise has all the safety system and more on every ASX and that includes auto brakes. Both have Apple and Android connectivity and both sound OK for OEM stereo systems but both cannot be easily replaced which is going to be bad for any one contemplating either SUV. In terms of engines, the Kona has carry over petrol or turbo petrol engines likewise the ASX has a ancient but efficient petrol and decent although overpowered diesel engine! In term of transmission the ASX has CVT throughout the range and the Kona has a regular gearbox for most of the range but a troublesome Dual clutch Auto for the top range model. We predict the top range Kona has good chance to encounter gearbox issues in the future.
Hyundai Kona Vs Mitsubishi ASX drive comparison: Haven’t driven the Kona yet although the ASX a couple times over the years but the only thing we can recall (because we aren’t going to search our own past review) is that there is nothing offensive about it even the CVT was OK for an older SUV.
The winner of the Hyundai Kona Vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison is the ASX. The ASX has more standard safety systems than has a better quality interior than new Kona which was a surprise to us. Furthermore the ASX is cheaper to buy than the Kona with lots of deals floating about. Sure the Kona has better performance if you buy the turbo engine and looks better but it comes with the DCT Auto which may cause problems in the future. This is based on all the problems experienced by all manufacturers that offer a DCT automatic gearbox. The price for the Kona is competitive, estimated on road price for the base model of $27,500 and just over $30,000 with the optional safety package meanwhile the ASX is 25,990 drive away (often less) with the same features and the a decent overseas holiday or two.
| Mitsubishi ASX | Hyundai Kona |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| 4 Cylinder (4B11) 2.0 Litre (1998cc) petrol (91 Octane) DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 110Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 197Nm @ 4200RPM |
4 Cylinder petrol G4NH 2 Litre (1999cc) 91 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 110Kw @ 6200 RPM Claimed 180Nm @ 4500 RPM |
| 4 Cylinder (4N14) 2.2 Litre (2268cc) diesel Turbo inter-ccooled DR DI Claimed 110Kw @ 3500RPM Claimed 360Nm @ 1500RPM |
4 Cylinder petrol G4FJ 1.6 Litre (1591c) 91 Octane DOHC VVT EFI Claimed 130Kw @ 5500 RPM Claimed 265Nm @ 1500 RPM |
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight 1340 Kg Towing capacity up to 1400kg |
From Approx Kerb weight 1366 Kg Towing capacity up to 800kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 63 litres IL4 2.0 Petrol 7.7 litres per 100km IL4 2.2 Diesel 5.8 litres per 100km |
Up to 50 litres IL4 2 Petrol 7.2 litres per 100km IL4 1.6 Turbo Petrol 6.7 litres per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 5 speed manual or CVT Auto Overall height/width 1640/1810 Overall length/Wheelbase 4365/2670 4WD system: FWD or AWD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 |
6 Speed Auto or 7 speed DCT Overall height/width 1565/1800 Overall length/wheelbase 4165/2600 4WD system: None ANCAP Safety: 5/5 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) 180 mm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) xxxmm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
| Performance | |
| Pricing | |
| 2017 $25,000 – 37,000 AUD 2015 $24,990 – 35,490 AUD 2013 $24,990 – 36,490 AUD |
2017 $24,500 – 36,000 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |