|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to the new Mitsubishi Triton Vs Mazda BT-50 comparison. With the update for one of the most popular Utes or light commercials or trucks, the Mitsubishi Triton we’re doing a new series featuring it against it’s competitors! The Mazda BT-50 has been updated since it’s 2012 release last year but that was basically restyled front head lights and equipment adjustments.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Mazda BT-50 exterior: Not much has changed on the BT-50 in terms of design over the years and the ‘update’ to more conservative front end was largely pointless. Conservative designs with an aggressive front end work well usually, but something just didn’t work out for the BT-50. It’s hard to believe that it is directly related to the Ford Ranger. The BT-50 also has the Hi-Rider versions which are 2WD only but have the raised suspension which does help it in the looks department but it it an expensive option. The Triton doesn’t have a similar version as the 2WD models already have raised ride height. The Mitsubishi Triton may be slightly smaller but easily the best looking ute compare to the BT-50.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Mazda BT-50 interior: The BT-50 interior is a good place to be in and it’s spacious and in line with Mazda’s car range from 5 year ago. Sit in the prior Mazda 3 and you be right at home in the BT-50. Unfortunately the design language and material quality has moved forward in the car and passenger SUV range but has left the commercial bias BT-50 behind. We do like the all button look in most models but the model equiped with the Sat Nav system is the one to get. The Triton interior is very sisal in concept to the BT-50 a very traditional commercial interior. The Triton interior is a bit boring really but arguably a nicer place to be in than the superseded version.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Mazda BT-50 engines and technology: In terms of engines the Mazda uses the same 2 models as the Ford Ranger but not the Raptor however that will probably come to the BT-50 as it is a Mazda engine. It has regular 6 speed auto or manual with a part time 4WD system and low range gear box. It’s all quite ordinary overall. In comparison to the new Triton and it’s fancy 4WD system show that the BT-50 is underdone for the the price. In other respects the Triton equals or surpasses the BT-50 when price comparison it taken into consideration.
The new Triton doesn’t appear to have any standout changes to the hardware but you can assume that refinement has been made to keep up with it’s competitors. The 4WD drivetrain is still worth a mention as it is the most advanced system in the ute class with the ability to use rear wheel drive or AWD on the road and a low range gearbox for proper off road capability and 4WD abilities. The update also sees the introduction of a 6 speed automatic gearbox and digital radio. All the other newer utes have cut short their off road capability by having only a extra low gear rather than a separate box and is a bit off a rip off with separate gear reduction. Pity Mitsubishi’s marketing department haven’t seen fit to point this out.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Mazda BT-50 drive: The old Triton was a descent enough drive. Firm sports car like suspension but leant in the corners, reasonably refined in terms of noice but you can still tell it’s a diesel. If the new Triton is queter and a fraction softer would help broaden it’s appeal.
The winner of the Mitsubishi Triton Vs Mazda BT-50 is the Triton. It’s hard to beat the Triton purely to the package – price and specification in particular the 4WD system. The BT-50 only has a large size and Ford Ranger spec to challenge the Triton and it’s not enough. Unless you really need the extra space Triton is the better Ute to buy and it’s clearly the better looker at least on the outside. The Triton is $8000-10000 cheaper than the equilivent BT-50 which is a significant saving and enough for a ton of mods or a long holiday.
| Mazda BT-50 | Mitsubishi Triton (2019) |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| MZ-CD – IL5 cylinder 3.2 Litre (3198cc) Diesel DOHC 20 Valve Turbo charged with intercooler Claimed 147Kw @ 3000 RPM Claimed 470Nm @ 1750 RPM |
IL4 Turbo Diesel Turbo DOHC 16 VVT EFI DI CR 2.4 Litre (2477cc) Claimed 133Kw @ 3500 RPM Claimed 430Nm @ 2500 RPM |
| Duratorq IL4 (P4AT) IL4 Turbo Diesel DOHC 16 Valve – Intercooler 2.2-liter (2198cc) Claimed 110Kw @ 3750 RPM Claimed 375Nm @ 1500 RPM |
|
| Weight | |
| FROM 2000Kg Towing capacity up to 3350kg |
FROM 1994 Kg Towing capacity up to 3100kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 80 litres IL5 Diesel 10 lts per 100km IL4 2.2 Diesel 7.6 lts per 100km |
Up to 75 litres 4N15 IL4 Diesel 7 lts per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 6 speed Auto or Manual Overall height/width 1821/1850 Overall length/wheelbase 5365/3220 Tray L1847 x W1560mm x D513mm Total payload capability 1000kg (Approx) ANCAP safety rating 5/5 |
6 speed manual or 6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1835/1815 Overall length/wheelbase 5254/3095 Tray L1520 x W1470 x D508 mm Total payload capability 906kg (Approx) NCAP safety rating 5/5 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach 28.2′ Departure 26.4′ Breakover 25′ Minimum ground clearance xxmm Water Fording depth 800 4WD system: Part time 4WD High & Low range |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach 28′ Departure 23 Breakover 25′ Minimum ground clearance 429mm Water Fording depth 500mm Max 2WD or 4WD or AWD with Low Range |
| Performance | |
| Pricing | |
| 2019 $45,510 – 58,330 AUD Dual Cab (4WD) 2012 $25,570 – 53,140 AUD (2WD & 4WD) *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc… |
2019 $35,490 – 51,990 AUD Dual Cab |