 |
VS |  |
This is a new Jeep X-Cherokee and Nissan X-Trail comparison. Both are new models and where released in late 2014 and we finally get a decent look at both models. Both represent the latest design themes from their brands and we actually like both models.
Jeep Cherokee Vs Nissan X-Trail exterior: The Cherokee is an interesting design at the front end while side and rear on its pretty much standard but the squared off wheel arches are a different touch. Overall it’s a good effort as the front integrates nicely with the rest of the car. The Jeep also does not look big and yet fits right into the highly competitive ‘correctly sized’ SUV like the CRV, CX-5 and the X-Trail. In comparison X-Trail’s design is ultimately conservative but it does look good. The rear end is the only questionable design choice as it makes it look thinner than it is. We applaud the daring Cherokee front end design and integration but the more conservative X-Trail looks good too. We don’t have a preference here.
Jeep Cherokee Vs Nissan X-Trail interior: The interior design and quality of the new Cherokee (even the base models) is right up to date and looks good in base and more so in the top range spec Trailhawk. The theme is more current ‘business car’ class with ‘busy’ impression. However you could also describe it as luxury car class although they tend to be minimal and that can only apply to the top end models. It uses VW like metal surrounds to distract but goes beyond VW by including very nice looking and feeling seats to impress (in some models). Indeed we think that the Cherokee has the best looking interior in the class in terms of quality of materials and build although does feel smaller than the Nissan. We regarded the X-trail interior as one of the best in the size class. In comparison the Cherokee’s design the X-Trail is clean and conservative with few creases and fitted with good quality materials. It looks and feels good in a lounge like ambience. Which one is better is your personal preference as both are very good.
Jeep Cherokee Vs Nissan X-Trail engine and technology: Once again the new Cherokee is a huge leap from the old model. There are so many technology upgrades and additions it’s hard to believe it’s a traditional Jeep. The class leading 9 speed transmission and optional multimode AWD system highlight the range. The Nissan has its fair share of tech but the average carry over engines and lack of a diesel AWD auto version and CVT for other variants make it reliable but old. The Jeep Cherokee wins with decent engine options and a regular but impressive 9 speed gearbox.
The conclusion to this comparison is clear, the Jeep Cherokee is the most modern and arguable best presented SUV currently available. The Cherokee also gets extra points because it is cheaper and you get more equipment. In the specification and showroom comparison it beats the Nissan if you prefer the sports car like ambiance and the standout front end design. The biggest issue with any Jeep is long term reliability. If even basic Jeep’s of the last decade have a number of issue it’s hard to imagine that a much more advanced version will have any less problems to deal with. Let’s hope it works out because the Cherokee is arguably the most impressive small SUV available – at this point in time.
| Jeep Cherokee | Nissan X-Trail |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| TigerShark MultiAir2 IL4 Cylinder Petrol DOHC EFI 2.4 Litre (2360cc) Claimed 130Kw @ 6400RPM Claimed 232Nm @ 46000PM |
IL 4 Cylinder Petrol (QR25) DOHC VVT EFI 2.5 Litre (2488cc) Claimed 126Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 226Nm @ 4400RPM |
| Pentastar V6 Cylinder Petrol DOHC EFI VVT 3.2 Litre (3239cc) Claimed 200Kw @ 6500RPM Claimed 316Nm @ 4400RPM |
IL 4 Cylinder Petrol (MR20) DOHC VVT EFI 2.0 Litre (1998cc) Claimed 106Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 200Nm @ 4400RPM |
| IL4 Cylinder Diesel Turbo 2.0 Litre (1956cc) Claimed 125Kw @ 000RPM Claimed 350Nm @ 000RPM |
IL 4 Cylinder Turbo Diesel (M9R) Direct Injection Common Rail EFI 2.0 Litre (1995cc) Claimed 96Kw @ 4000RPM Claimed 320Nm @ 1750RPM |
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight FROM 1638Kg Towing capacity up to 1800Kg |
FROM 1437 Kg Towing capacity up to 1500kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| 60 litres TigerShark IL4 Petrol: 8.3 litres per 100km Pentastar V6: 10 litres per 100km IL Diesel: litres per 100km |
Up to 60 litres IL4 Petrol 2.0lt 8.2 litres per 100km AVG (Manual) IL4 Petrol 2.5lt 8.3 litres per 100km AVG (CVT) IL4 Diesel 2.0lt 5.3 litres per 100km AVG (CVT) |
| Other specifications | |
| 9 speed Auto Overall height/width 1631/1859 Overall length/wheelbase 4623/2700 Drive system: AWD or 4WD or Front Only Tyre size: 235-60-17 235-55-18 NCAP safety rating 5/5 |
6 speed manual or CVT with programmed 7 speeds Overall height/width 1710/1820 Overall length/Wheelbase 4640/2705 4WD system: Selectable 2WD or AWD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Trailhawk version only! Approach 29.9 Departure 32.2 Breakover 22.9 Ground clearance (unloaded Trailhawk only) 221 mm Water Fording depth 508mm Max |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) xxxmm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
| Performance | |
| – | – |
| Pricing | |
| 2015 $27,490 – 47,500 AUD | 2014 $27,990 – 44,990 AUD 2013 $35,000 – 43,900 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |