|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to the comparison between the new Mazda CX-9 Vs Holden Captiva comparison for 2016. With the release of the new CX-9 we decided to compare it with the Holden Captiva, since it has been quite a while since we’ve reviewed it with any Holden. Essentially the Captiva has issues so its best you do you’re own research on problems with it’s quality and reliability. Over the years the Captiva came in two sizes but has now been reduced to just the one, the larger 7 seat version and simply called the Capitva.
Mazda CX-9 Vs Holden Captiva exterior comparison: The Holden Capitva is a nice looking SUV overall, having mostly conservative lines considering its age but what spoils the look is the added chrome trim typical of cars made for Asian market and on it’s last refresh before replacement. Make no mistake chrome trim highlights placed correctly adds to a cars appearance but used as per the Captiva cheapens the appearance. The quality of the paint used is also ‘thin’ except for white. The Mazda CX-9 is a great to look at even if the design doesn’t appeal to you the quality should, easily the better looking SUV.
Mazda CX-9 Vs Holden Capitva interior comparison: The interior o the Captiva is good but it’s not high end but heading towards the low end. It’s has a very early 2000’s style to it and also quality. They have tried to update it over the years but it is not a complete success, essentially is a old school interior design cheap-ish but not that bad by 2016 standards. Although it feels a size smaller despite the extra row of seats but then it is a cheap SUV for the size. The CX-9 is clearly the latest and most refined interior we’ve seen to date on a non-prestige SUV feels and looks good, sells itself really.
Mazda CX-9 Vs Holden Captiva engines and technology comparison: The best thing about the Holden Captiva is the up to date stereo system. The Mazda CX-9 does not have the latest connectivity option like Apple or Android Auto and we think this is a technology feature is becoming more important as we approach 2017 hence is it’s weakest point, that said bluetooth connectivity works perfectly. The diesel engine option is the only decent engine in the Captiva range as the V6 is essentially broken by a torque figure that belongs to a 2.4 litre 4 cylinder engine! Hence the single engine option in the CX-7 is preferable to any in the Captiva range. Holden needs to provide suitable specifications on all Captiva models since as is today it is essentially a fail. There is so much more real safety features in the CX-9 than the Captiva.
Mazda CX-9 Vs Holden Captiva drive comparison: N/A
The Mazda CX-9 presents really well in the specification comparison and in the showroom to the Holden Captiva. The Holden Captiva is clearly the older model but has the redeeming feature of being cheap to buy and there are plenty of deals official and unofficial around and other issues too.
| Holden Captiva | Mazda CX-9 (2017) |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| V6 Petrol DOHC DI EFI 3.0 Litre (2997cc) Claimed 190Kw @ 6900 RPM Claimed 288Nm @ 5800 RPM |
IL 4 Cylinder Turbo DOHC VVT EFI 2.5 Litre (2488cc) Claimed 170Kw @ 5000 RPM Claimed 420Nm @ 2000 RPM |
| IL4 Cylinder Diesel DI CR 2.2 Litre (2199cc) Claimed 135Kw @ 3800 RPM Claimed 400Nm @ 1750 RPM |
|
| IL4 Petrol DOHC DI EFI 2.4 Litre (2384cc) Claimed 123Kw @ 5600 RPM Claimed 230Nm @ 4600 RPM |
|
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight FROM 1775Kg Towing capacity up to 2000Kg |
From 1924Kg Towing capacity up to 2000g |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 65 litres IL4 Diesel xx litres per 100km IL4 Petrol xx litres per 100km (91 Octane) V6 Petrol xx litres per 100km (91 Octane) |
72 litres – 95 Octane IL4 Turbo 8.4 litres per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 6 speed Auto or Manual Overall height/width 1727/1756 Overall length/wheelbase 4673/2707 NCAP safety rating 5/5 |
6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1747/1969 Overall length/wheelbase 5075/2930 NCAP safety rating 5/5 Tyre size: 255-60-18 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach ?? Departure ?? Breakover ?? Min ground clearance 200 mm 4WD system: FWD or AWD |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach ?? Departure ?? Breakover ?? Min ground clearance ??mm Water Fording depth ??mm Max 4WD system: AWD with selectable modes |
| Performance | |
| Pricing | |
| 2016 $26,490 – 41,490 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |
2016 $42,490 – 63,390 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. everything as usual is subject to change! |