VS |
Welcome to the new Mitsubishi Triton Vs Holden Colorado comparison for 2015. We like the look of the Colorado now, as it is a good blend of American and Japanese. The Colorado is based on the Isuzu D-Max but with a GM family engine, while the Triton is designed and built for Mitsubishi, although we believe it will soon be used as a base for a French manufacturer probably Peugeot.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Holden Colorado exterior: Once again each to their own here to which one you like the look of. However we have to point out the the Triton is more cohesive in terms of design where as the Colorado rear end is at odds with the front. Note that the Chevrolet Colorado version is a much, much better design and one that Holden should have used.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Holden Colorado interior: The Triton has the better interior design presentation and quality. The Colorado design is simply too commercial or downmarket, that said the Colorado feels more spacious thanks to ‘thinner’ design elements. We can and you will easily understand why it doesn’t sell as many as the others.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Holden Colorado technology: For 2015 the Triton has the latest engine and tech and so does the Holden, both featuring upgrade in car entertainment systems. Apart from that both offer the single powerful diesel engine across the range, although the manual Colorado has less power.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Holden Colorado drive: N/A
It’s an easy win to the Triton purely based on price and specification. The Holden Colorado has rip off pricing for the 4WD dual cab, at over $47,000 in the road for the basic ute without any thing or specials. The Holden Colorado sits perfectly in the WTF price zone along with the VW Amarok. Our recommendation is simple avoid the Colorado until it is given realistic pricing and updated interior and equipment. We could not see ourselves buy the Colorado for the business or even privately. Easy win for the Triton.
Mitsubishi Triton | Holden Colorado |
Engines | |
4N15 IL4 Diesel Turbo DOHC 16 VVT EFI DI CR 2.4 Litre (2477cc) Claimed 133Kw @ 3500 RPM Claimed 430Nm @ 2500 RPM |
Automatic 2.8 Litre (2776cc) Diesel Turbo charged with intercooler Claimed 147Kw @ 3600 RPM Claimed 500Nm @ 2000 RPM |
Manual 2.8 Litre (2776cc) Diesel Turbo charged with intercooler Claimed 147Kw @ 3600 RPM Claimed 440Nm @ 2000 RPM |
|
Weight | |
From 1900 Kg Towing capacity up to 3100kg |
FROM 2000 Kg Towing capacity up to 3500kg |
Fuel capacity & consumption | |
Up to 75 litres 4N15 IL4 Diesel 7 lts per 100km |
Up to 76 litres Auto Diesel 9.1 lts per 100km Manual Diesel 8.4 lts per 100km |
Other specifications | |
6 speed manual or 5 speed Auto Overall height/width 1780/1815 Overall length/wheelbase 5280/3000 Tray L1520 x W1475 x D475 mm Total payload capability 935kg (Approx) NCAP safety rating ?/5 |
6 speed manual or 6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1780/1882 Overall length/wheelbase 5347/3096 Tray Lxxxx x Wxxxx x Dxxx mm Total payload capability 927kg (Approx) NCAP safety rating ?/5 |
Capability | |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach 30′ Departure 28′ Breakover 24′ Minimum ground clearance 429mm Water Fording depth 500mm Max Dual range All Wheel Drive or 2WD |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach 28 Departure 23 Breakover N/A Minimum ground clearance 429mm Water Fording depth 500mm Max All Wheel Drive or 2WD |
Performance | |
Pricing | |
2015 $24,490 – 47,490 AUD From $36,990 Dual Cab 4WD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc… |
2015 $28,390 – 57,190 AUD From $44,990 Dual Cab 4WD |