|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to the Mitsubishi Triton Vs Volkswagen Amarok comparison for 2019. We haven’t compared the Volkswagen Amarok with anything for a while as it has some issues. With the new Triton fresh from the factory we decided to update the comparison for 2019 and to see if the Amarok still deserves our low opinion rating.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Volkswagen Amarok exterior comparison: If you like conservative looks than the Amarok will be the most beautiful ute in the world but to us and it’s looks the most commercial truck and clearly an older model. The Triton on the other hand is a modern looking design, looks good and arguably the best in the class. One design feature which we think is pointless is the tough looking bar work in the tray is just take up space rather being genuinely useful as it’s secured to the tray by a couple screws to the top of the tray which mean you can’t really use it to secure stuff. Does the base Amarok look worth $45,000? the answer is no in the top range Amarok look $73,000 worth definitely no.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Volkswagen Amarok interior comparison: The VW interior is a good place to be in but there are packaging issues that we’ve pointed out in prior comparisons. For a originally clean sheet design it’s not good start. Thankfully everything else is good for a commercial was one of the best quality until the release of the current class of utes.Top range models use really high end seats form the more sporty models in the VW range. The new Triton interior is good enough but it’s nearly up to the design or quality of the Amarok. does the base Amarok interior feel like it worth $45,000? the answer is no. Is the top range Amarok worth $73,000 worth – definitely not.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Volkswagen Amarok engines and technology comparison: The VW Amarok claims to have the fastest and most powerful utes in the class with the 580 model. Although we think VW cheats in the engine power specification on by using the turbo tuning trick to charge you more of the same engine with a tuned turbo. This remains true and hence a rip off with only two engines in various states of turbo tuning. The Amarok does not have a low range gear box just a extra low 1st gear ratio which is a cheap way of do things which is typical of the brand. However by all accounts it works. Is the Triton worth $51,000 for it’s spec sheet – Yes. Is the base model Amarok worth $45,000? – No and is the top range Amarok worth $73,000 – definitely No but is is worth $59,000 – maybe with the top spec engine. Another interesting
The winner Mitsubishi Triton Vs Volkswagen Amarok comparison is the Triton. It’s a performance Vs value equation. The Triton ticks all the boxes with good performance, comfort specification, street cred and so forth. The VW Amarok only covers the performance need but at an unrealistic price for that single feature. Most of the Amarok model range is overpriced for sure and when compared not just to the Triton. Furthermore the turbo tuning trick still is a rip off and hence the Amarok should be avoided simply on principle. Is the Amarok worth $7000 to $20000 price difference to the Triton – No way. Save the money and 1-5 years off your mortgage.
| Mitsubishi Triton | VW Amarok |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| IL4 Turbo Diesel Turbo DOHC 16 VVT EFI DI CR 2.4 Litre (2477cc) Claimed 133Kw @ 3500 RPM Claimed 430Nm @ 2500 RPM |
IL4 Cylinder Diesel Twin Turbo DI CR 2.0 Litre (1968cc) Diesel Claimed 132Kw @ 4000 RPM Claimed 400Nm @ 1500 RPM |
| IL4 Cylinder Diesel Twin Turbo DI CR 2.0 Litre (1968cc) Diesel Claimed 132Kw @ 4000 RPM Claimed 420Nm @ 1750 RPM |
|
| 3.0 Litre (2967cc) Diesel Turbo DOHC EFI DI CR Claimed 165Kw @ 4500 RPM Claimed 550Nm @ 1500 RPM |
|
| 3.0 Litre (2967cc) Diesel Turbo DOHC EFI DI CR Claimed 190Kw @ 4500 RPM Claimed 580Nm @ 1500 RPM |
|
| Weight | |
| FROM 1994 Kg Towing capacity up to 3100kg |
FROM 2007 Kg Towing capacity up to 3000kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 75 litres 4N15 IL4 Diesel 7 lts per 100km |
Up to 80 litres Diesel 2.0 lt 8.4 lts per 100km Diesel 2.0 lt V2 8.9 lts per 100km Diesel 3.0 lt 9.2 lt per 100km Diesel 3.0 lt V2 8.9 lt per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 6 speed manual or 6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1835/1954 Overall length/wheelbase 5254/3095 Tray L1520 x W1470 x D508 mm Total payload capability 906kg (Approx) NCAP safety rating 5/5 |
6 speed manual or 8 speed Auto 10 speed automatic – 2L twin turbo only Overall height/width 1834/1954 Overall length/wheelbase 5254/3095 Tray Lxxx x Wxxxx x Dxxx mm Total payload capability 1033kg (Approx) NCAP safety rating 5/5 |
| Capability | |
| Varies dependent on configuration. Angle of: (degrees) Approach 28′ Departure 23 Breakover 25′ Minimum ground clearance 429mm Water Fording depth 500 mm Max 2WD or 4WD or AWD with Low Range |
Varies dependent on configuration. Angle of: (degrees) Approach 28′ Departure 23.6′ Breakover 23′ Minimum ground clearance 192 – 226 mm Water Fording depth 500 mm Max 4WD system: AWD or 2WD |
| Performance | |
| Pricing (Dual-Cab) |
|
| 2019 $37,490 – 51,990 AUD 2018 From $38,000 – 48,000 AUD 2015 $36,990 – 47,490 AUD *Dual Cab Auto 4×4 – Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc… |
2019 From $43,090 – 72,790 AUD 2018 From $50,000 AUD Dual Cab 4WD *Dual Cab Auto 4×4 – Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc… |