|
|
VS |
|
This is the Mitsubishi Express / Renault Trafic Vs Hyundai iLoad comparison and showroom review for 2020. The iLoad was a very competitive light commercial van when released over 10 years ago . It has refinement, power and space compared to the its only really competitor the Hiace. However it has now been joined by the new Mitsubishi Express the rebadged Renault Traffic amongst many new competitors never seen before.
Mitsubishi Express / Renault Trafic Vs Hyundai iLoad exterior comparison: As we’ve said before the Mitsubishi Express is clearly a rebadge of the Renault Trafic. So everything that is good and bad relating to the Renault applies to the Mitsubishi Express as well. Overall the Express is a good looking van and it does have more individual styling elements to it than it’s competitors including the iLoad. The iLoad is clearly the older design and to some that’s a good thing but to most its needs another refresh if Hyundai are not replacing the underlying platform.
Mitsubishi Express / Renault Trafic Vs Hyundai iLoad interior comparison: Both interiors are pretty good and mini-van like. In the iLoad we don’t mind the dated curves and round edges but it’s so 2000’s in terms of ambience. It is also surprising that they don’t really have commercial features like specific mobile phone, tablet or scanning, toll tags, CB radio or even GPS mounting points. That said the Express is the bigger van and has more odd item storage.
Mitsubishi Express / Renault Trafic Vs Hyundai iLoad engines and technology comparison: The Express / Traffic does not have any more technical features than the iLoad in terms of safety but loses it on the perception of reliability and running costs. This is the perception of the Renault Trafic and inherently applies to the Express as well. Only time will tell weather Renault’s QC is good enough for the long term and brand reputation. As a commercial vehicle the tech needs to be reliable as that is what they are supposed to be built for as any down time costs money. The iLoad’s reliability as a commercial has been proven and it’s technical features are it’s engine and rear wheel drive however it is missing little things like parking sensors for example.
The conclusion and winner of the Mitsubishi Express / Renault Trafic Vs Hyundai iLoad comparison is the new Mitsubishi Express. It’s not about why the Express/ Traffic wins but why the Hyundai iLoad doesn’t. Being an established and proven model there hasn’t been any technical upgrades – just a front end face lift, yet they still have the same asking price. The iLoad is also missing parking sensors which is unforgivable in 2020 and reflective of Hyundai’s general corporate philosophy these days. Hence having the same features from 13 years ago it just doesn’t deserve a win in our opinion.
| Hyundai iLoad | Mitsubishi Express |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| 4 Cylinder Turbo Diesel 2.5 Litre (2497cc) Manual – CR DI DOHC 16 Valve Claimed 100Kw @ 3800 RPM Claimed 343Nm @ 1500-2500 RPM Or Auto – CR DI DOHC 16 Valve Claimed 125Kw @ 3400 RPM Claimed 441Nm @ 2000-2250 RPM |
4 Cylinder Turbo Diesel 2.0 Litre (1999cc) DOHC IC DI Claimed 125Kw @ 3500 RPM Claimed 380Nm @ 1500 RPM |
| 4 Cylinder Twin Turbo Diesel 1.6 Litre (1598cc) DOHC IC DI Claimed 103Kw @ 3500 RPM Claimed 340Nm @ 1500 RPM |
|
| Weight (Approx) | |
| Kerb weight FROM 2062Kg Load carrying 1200 Kg Towing capacity up to 1500kg |
Kerb weight FROM 1810Kg Load carrying 1000Kg Towing capacity up to 1700kg GVM 2960kg – 3070kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 75 litres IL4 2.5 Diesel 7.6 lts per 100km (Manual) IL4 2.5 Diesel 8.8 lts per 100km (Auto) |
Up to 80 litres IL4 1.6 litre Diesel 6.2 lts per 100km IL4 2.0 litre Diesel 7.3 lts per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 6 speed manual or 5 speed Auto Overall height/width 1935/1920 Overall length/wheelbase 5150/3200 4WD system: None – Rear wheel drive ANCAP Safety: 4/5 |
6 speed manual or 6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1971/1956 Overall length/wheelbase 4999-5399 /3098-3498 4WD system: None – Front wheel drive ANCAP Safety: x/5 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) 195 mm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) 160 mm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
| Load Dimensions | |
| SWB: 2375L x 1620W x 1340H Between wheel arches: 1272 Volume: |
Short WB: 2210L x 1662W x 1386H Long WB: 2610L x 1662W x 1386H Between wheel arches: 1268 |
| Performance | |
| – | |
| Pricing | |
| 2020 $38,790 – 44,740 AUD | 2020 $38,490 – 44,490 AUD xxxxxxxxx |
| *Specifications based on configuration and is subject to change. Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, specifications, on-road costs, accessories and specials etc.. | |