|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to the (2016 model update) Mitsubishi Triton Vs 2016 Ford Ranger (Mark 2). With the refresh of the Ford Ranger and the new Triton released we decided to do a quick spec and showroom comparison. We do like both models for different reasons.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Ford Ranger exterior: The Ranger is the bigger SUV no question. It sits noticeably wider and seemingly taller thanks to what we call bloated design. Regardless of the design style it does look good and clearly inspired by Ford US truck design. Mitsubishi is one manufacturer not afraid to make bold design choices. Some times they work and sometime they don’t. 2002 Pajero and 2012 Outlander are clear reminders. The Triton is the smaller SUV but not by much and it looks more generic. The look seems to grow on us over a small space of time. However prefer the Ranger’s exterior sheetmetal this time.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Ford Ranger interior: The interior of the Triton looks good in a normal 2000-ish style. The materials are better than the last model and there are plenty of entertainment features dependent on model but mostly in the family orientated specification does not really feel too commercial. Most will probably go for the top end model because it is affordable compared to other brands. The latest update to the Ford Ranger makes it arguably the best interior in the class. Its all classs from the high tech dash to the floor. The new design sets it apart from its former twin the Mazda BT-50 and scores better design and materials. Easy win to the Ranger in this area.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Ford Ranger technology: Interestingly the Triton has the more advanced transmission, being either RWD or selectable AWD on normal roads. In all other respects both are pretty much equal in terms of tech features including stereo system. However the Triton adds HID lights and LEDs that are missing from the Ranger. In terms of engines the Triton has a decent turbo diesel considering it’s small 2.4 litre displacement but the Ford out powers the Triton easily due not only more power but a 6 gear auto vs 5 speed. That said the Triton isn’t exactly slow merely having 10% less torque an 14Kw less and over 100kg lighter. Both have their reliability issues known so the winner is definitely the Triton due to being able to select AWD on the freeway.
Mitsubishi Triton Vs Ford Ranger drive: Summary, the Triton is a decent drive, firms suspension and reasonably direct steering. It’s quite smooth, not too noisy and surprisingly comfortable. Press the AWD button for a notably reassuring and solid ride and feels a touch sporty sort of…
The winner Mitsubishi Triton Vs Ford Ranger comparison is the Triton. The Triton easily wins by being $10,000 cheaper than the Ranger for the most desirable models without the 4WD where as the Triton has it as standard and approx $16,000 cheaper for the top range models. That’s a huge price difference in comparison to the top range Triton Exceed to the top end Ranger Wildtrack. You can’t even get a 4WD system in the mid range Ranger for the price of the Ranger topper Triton Exceed. Easy win for the Triton.
| Mitsubishi Triton | Ford Ranger |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| 4N15 IL4 Diesel Turbo DOHC 16 VVT EFI DI CR 2.4 Litre (2477cc) Claimed 133Kw @ 3500 RPM Claimed 430Nm @ 2500 RPM |
IL5 Cylinder Diesel 3.2 Litre (3198cc) Diesel Turbo DOHC 20V EFI DI CR Claimed 147Kw @ 3000 RPM Claimed 470Nm @ 1750 RPM |
| 2.2 Litre (2198cc) Diesel Turbo DOHC EFI DI CR Claimed 118Kw @ 3200 RPM Claimed 385Nm @ 1600 RPM |
|
| Weight | |
| From 1900 Kg Towing capacity up to 3100kg |
FROM 2000 Kg Towing capacity up to 3500kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 75 litres 4N15 Diesel 7 lts per 100km |
Up to 80 litres Diesel 2.2lts 9.2 lts per 100km Diesel 3.2lts 8.8 lts per 100km |
| Other specifications | |
| 6 speed manual or 5 speed Auto Overall height/width 1780/1815 Overall length/wheelbase 5280/3000 Tray L1520 x W1475 x D475 mm Total payload capability 935kg (Approx) NCAP safety rating ?/5 |
6 speed manual or 6 speed Auto Overall height/width 1795/1860 Overall length/wheelbase 5362/3220 Tray L1549 x W1560 x D511 mm Total payload capability 1120kg (Approx) NCAP safety rating ?/5 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach 30′ Departure 28′ Breakover 24′ Minimum ground clearance 229mm Water Fording depth 500mm Max Dual range All Wheel Drive or 2WD |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach 28′ Departure 27′ Breakover 24′ Minimum ground clearance 232 mm Water Fording depth 800mm Max Dual range 4WD or 2WD |
| Performance | |
| Pricing | |
| 2015 $24,490 – 47,490 AUD From $36,990 Dual Cab 4WD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc… |
2012 $19,990 – 59,390 AUD (2WD & 4WD) *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc… |