|
|
VS |
|
Welcome to our Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Mazda CX-5 comparison for 2019. This is part of an unusual series of comparisons by mainstream standards aka popular motoring press, as why would any one compare an urban focused SUV like the CX-5 with a genuine off-road capable 4WD Mitsubishi Pajero Sport? We think they are comparable due to price and purpose. Sure each have their speciality and we were faced with a similar decision to sell the Prado for a CX-5. Only the arrogant or brainwashed by Press releases would think or have the opinion otherwise.
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Mazda CX-5 exterior comparison : We like the Pajero Sport’s exterior design. It looks good in a modern way and will not date within the next decade if current designs by other manufacturers are an indication. The CX-5 uses the latest Mazda design language looking like what most would envision a sporty wagon to look like. All the proportions are good but unfortunately left with a very looking generic rear end. Both are nice but we think the Pajero Sport looks nicer!
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Mazda CX-5 interior comparison : The interior of the Mazda CX-5 is very good in the low end models and excellent in the top range models. I rare to find a car or SUV in the price range that looks and feels this good especially for a mainstream model. It is more upmarket than the equilivent Pajero Sport. The Pajero Sport is noticeably larger on the inside but more so in length than width. Regardless we’re sure most will find the interior of the CX-5 a nicer place to be in but the Pajero Sport is quite good too.
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Mazda CX-5 engines and technology comparison : The CX-5 has a range to engines that consist of non turbos and a twin turbo diesel engine. The non-turbo petrol engines are the most advanced in the world as they produce decent power and meet emissions. In terms of petrol engines Mazda have truly overtaken the once leading edge engineering status that Honda once had and even surpassed BMW and Mercedes. There is also the new turbo petrol which can only be described as a powerful engine! Unfortunately the CX-5’s diesel engine while a twin turbo unit makes only decent power it is not the most powerful or efficient in the class and the AWD system is an on-demand system. In terms of safety the CX-5 has all the latest gadgets including auto brakes but it is still as annoying as the rest systems currently available. In comparison the Pajero Sport has the single turbo diesel that produces good power although not exactly powerful. The Pajero Sport also has the safety systems equal to the CX-5 including auto brakes and also a has fully featured 4WD system for real off road driving. As a result the Pajero Sport has the edge in terms of technology specification.
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Mazda CX-5 road test: N/A
The conclusion of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Mazda CX-5 comparison is the Pajero Sport. The Pajero Sport is hard to beat due to it’s overall package. It’s fully equipped to match urban SUVs and at a price that is affordable for anyone wanting a great value 4WD. However if you want a smaller, easy to drive in urban environments and a great interior than the CX-5 is the best choice but if you want value for money and happy with the compromise then you know which other SUV to buy.
| Mitsubishi Pajero Sport |
Mazda CX-5 |
 |
 |
| Engines | |
| IL4 Diesel Turbo DOHC 16 VVT EFI DI CR 2.4 Litre (2442cc) Claimed 133Kw @ 3500 RPM Claimed 430Nm @ 2500 RPM |
IL 4 Cylinder Petrol DOHC EFI VVT 2.0 Litre (1996cc) Claimed 114Kw @ 6000RPM Claimed 200Nm @ 4000RPM |
| IL4 Cylinder Petrol 2.5 Litre (2488cc) DOHC Engine EFI Claimed 138Kw @ 5700RPM Claimed 250Nm @ 4000RPM |
|
| IL 4 Cylinder Twin Turbo Diesel DI CR EFI 2.2 Litre (2191cc) Claimed 129Kw @ 4500RPM Claimed 420Nm @ 2000RPM |
|
| IL4 Cylinder Turbo Petrol 2.5 Litre (2488cc) DOHC VVT EFI IC Claimed 170Kw @ 5000RPM Claimed 420Nm @ 2000RPM |
|
| Weight | |
| Kerb weight FROM 2060Kg Towing capacity up to 3100kg |
FROM 1511 Kg Towing capacity up to 1800kg |
| Fuel capacity & consumption | |
| Up to 68 litres Diesel 8 litres per 100km (Auto) |
Up to 58 litres IL4 2.0 Petrol 6.9 Lts per 100km AVG IL4 2.5 Petrol 7.5 Lts per 100km AVG IL4 2.2 Diesel 6 Lts per 100km AVG IL4 2.5 Turbo Petrol 8.2 Lts per 100km AVG |
| Other specifications | |
| 8 speed Auto Overall height/width 1805/1815 Overall length/wheelbase 4785/2800 4WD system: 2WD or AWD NCAP safety rating 5/5 |
6 speed Auto or Manual Overall height/width 1675/1840 Overall length/wheelbase 4550/2700 4WD system: FWD or On demand AWD ANCAP Safety: 5/5 |
| Capability | |
| Angle of: (degrees) Approach 20 Departure 24 Breakover 23 Minimum ground clearance 218 mm Water Fording depth 700mm Max 4WD system: 4WD with low range |
Angle of: (degrees) Approach xx Departure xx Breakover xx Ground clearance (unloaded) 200 mm Water Fording depth xxmm Max |
| Performance | |
| – | IL4 Turbo Petrol 0-100kph 7.7 seconds |
| Pricing | |
| 2019 $46,000 – 54,200 AUD 2017 $45,000 – $49,990 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing and specials accessories etc… |
2019 $30,380 – 50,130 AUD 2017 $28,690 – $49,990 AUD *Always check with the dealer for up to date pricing, on-roads and specials accessories etc… |