Mitsubishi Triton |
VS | Holden Colarado |
Welcome to the 2013 Holden Colorado vs Mitsubishi Triton comparison. The all new Holden Colarado has just been released in the country (June 2012) so we put up a quick specification comparison between the two models. The Triton has been for sale in its current series since about 2006 and what we believe is still the nicest looking SUV/ute on the market (on the outside). Mitsubishi got the design right and it shows.
Here is the comparison of the key specifications of the Triton and Colorado for the time being and will update the page as we get more details and drive of the Colorado. The Triton is still one of the better light commercial utes on the market but it is overshadowed by the noticeably more refined Hilux, Navara, BT-50, Ranger and Amarok but it is not about absolute refinement in this category but reputation, cost to run and reliability. The Triton all the key criteria (despite its few known problems) but the latest utes don’t. The only problem with the Triton is pricing – it is relatively expensive.
Further updates will be posted when we get a drive of the new Colorado.
|
|
Mitsubishi Triton | Holden Colarado |
Engines | |
4G64 4D56
|
APD G102 Duramax 2.5 IL4 Diesel APL G102 Duramax 2.8 IL4 Diesel |
Weight | |
From 1672Kg |
Kerb weight: FROM 1805Kg |
Fuel capacity & consumption | |
Up to 75 litres |
Up to 76 litres |
Other specifications | |
5 or 4 speed Auto |
6 speed Auto or 5 speed manual |
Capability | |
Angle of: (degrees) |
Angle of: (degrees) |
Performance | |
Pricing | |
2012 FROM $38,900 AUD |
2012 $42,990 – 51,990 AUD *4×4 crew-cab (dual cab) 2012 $40,490 – 49,490 AUD *4×4 space-cab 2012 $34,990 – 37,990 AUD *4×4 single-cab |
|